Every public school student has subjected to endless global warming propaganda during the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations, but none have seen any warming during their lifetime. April temperatures dropped this year despite the El Nino, and were about the same as 1983. There has been no global warming for 19 years.
RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_Land_And_Sea_v03_3.txt
Global warming theory is based on tropospheric warming, so NASA ignores the troposphere and instead measures temperatures next to asphalt.
This is what 19 years of global warming looks like. It occurred from 1918 to 1937
This is what 19 years of no warming looks like
No , but the School Children have been subject to brainwashing & propaganda ; those subjects will invaluable towards ClimAstrology.
Reblogged this on Climatism.
It’s much worse than the global data shows. (as some already know) High school students in large areas of the northern hemisphere have actually been through the most extreme winters and cold anyone alive has been through. Since they started off during the milder winter trend, it seems that climate has changed a lot to them. So at the same time they hear the constant refrain of “hotter than ever”, they experience “colder than ever”, which might be promoting the skepticism found in the young. (or the “who cares?”)
You can’t sell somebody on global warming when it is obviously getting colder. Summer heat waves do not have the lasting impact that record snow and cold does.
Especially when ten or so years ago (2004 & 2005) was a real scorcher at least here in North Carolina. We had six days in a row at 98 °F (Down graded from 101 °F) and a total of 24 days above ninety for the month of July (2004) not to mention 6 days over 90 °F in April 2004 and 17 days over 90F in May 2004.
I count 43 day over ninety F for 2004 by July tenth vs 26 days for 2010.
In 2013 there were only five days ninety over. BIG CHANGE! Only one day at 95°F and 4 days at 91°F. That has been ‘adjusted’ to FIFTEEN DAYS ninety or above. 2014 was a little hotter than 2013 but not much. The highest temp was only one day at 97°F and only four over 95 and a total over 22 over 90°F.
July 2005 was even worse. 26 days ninety and over with ten days at 98 °F and three days at 102 °F.
Global Warming WHAT Global Warming…..
Just remember that Climate Change is just Global Warming without the warming.
Wait. What?
Global warming is not something to be seen, like a solar eclipse, for example. I guess we should agree that humans are no strager to climate change. Global warming is no natural cycle. At least I don’t think so. Too many environment aggression in the past 150 years. I think that one of the main causes of the climate change is represented by naval wars and by human activity on the oceans. Here are some ideas and research that sustain my believes: http://www.1ocean-1climate.com.
Hubris
Modern humans have not yet seen real climate change. The type of climate change Mother Nature is fully capable of throwing at us all by her lonesome.
http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/lappi/65_Myr_Climate_Change_Rev.jpg
http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/lappi/Five_Myr_Climate_Change_Rev.jpg
http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/graphs/lappi/gisp-last-10000-new.png
Woods Hole Observatory warned about wide temperature swings a few years ago and that politicians maybe barking up the wrong tree.
Abrupt Climate Change: Should We Be Worried?
There was even a committee formed and a book written: Abrupt Climate Change – Inevitable Surprises”, Committee on Abrupt Climate Change, National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, ISBN: 0-309-51284-0, 244 pages, Richard B. Alley, chair.
Richard B. Alley of the U.Penn. was elected to the National Academy of Sciences, chaired the National Research Council on Abrupt Climate Change. for well over a decade and in 1999 was invited to testify about climate change by Vice President Al Gore. In 2002, the NAS (Alley chair) published the book.
. From the opening paragraph in the executive summary:
Alley is not the only one who has documented natural abrupt climate change. The earth has seen abrupt climate change since the Holocene Optimum.
Holocene temperature history at the western Greenland Ice Sheet margin reconstructed from lake sediments – Axford et al. (2012)
You can not blame those abrupt changes on mankind either since they are seen in other interglacials.
A late Eemian aridity pulse in central Europe during the last glacial inception Sirocko and Seelos, 2005
That is a heck of a long time to be sitting on the edge of a cliff waiting for other factors to push the earth into glaciation.
What about Glacial Inception going forward?
That is what SHOULD be the real concern. Even if the earth does not go full Ice Age the earth will be at the threshold for thousands of years. A threshold region described as a climatic “madhouse”! by Neuman and Hearty (1996) Rapid Sea-level Changes at the Close of the Last Interglacial (substage_5e) Recorded in Bahamian Island Geology
Loutre and Berger’s 2003 paper, based on models, said the Holocene would go long and be a double precession cycle. Loutre and Berger focused on MIS 11, the only known double precession cycle as a possible analog for the Holocene.
More recent papers refute this.
New MIS 19 EPICA Dome C high resolution deuterium data: Hints for a problematic
preservation of climate variability at sub-millennial scale in the “oldest ice”
Jouzel et al., (2007)
The post Holocene Climate Optimum warm events, are: the Medieval Warm Period, Roman and Minoan. As of 2014 the Holocene is exactly 11,717 years old (based on the end of the Younger Dryas cold interval). The precession cycle itself varies between 19 and 23kyrs and we are at the 23kyr part of that cycle now, making 11,500 half.
An even more robust paper based on A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic D18O records by Lisiecki & Raymo (2005) disagree with Loutre and Berger’s conclusions.
From the paper Can we predict the duration of an interglacial? I extracted the 21 June solar insolation @ 65? N for several glacial inceptions:
So the Holocene is within the window of solar insolation @ 65? N when glacial-inception occurred during other interglacials.
From NOAA:
(www1DOT)ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/climate_forcing/orbital_variations/berger_insolation/insol91.jun
Holocene peak insolation: 523 Wm-2
……………………………………………..decrease = 47 Wm-2
NOW (modern Warm Period) 476 Wm-2
…………………………………………….. decrease = 12 Wm-2
Depth of the last ice age – around 464 Wm?2
The Holocene interglacial started abruptly(within one year according to Alley) between 12ka and 11ka NOAA gives the following insolation values:
11 ka … 523.16 Wm-2
12 ka … 522.50 Wm-2
So near peak insolation was needed to boot the earth out of the Wisconsin Ice Age into the Holocene. Not a concept to give anyone the warm fuzzies. Especially when Obummer and the idiots in the EU ticked off Putin so Russia is “moving rapidly to bolster ties with North Korea.” A North Korea run by a nutter like Kim Jong-un who might be stupid enough to lob a nuke at Yellowstone.
Does North Korea have that capability? North Korea put a satellite in space in 2012. In 2006, 2009 and again in 2013, North Korea claimed that it had conducted successful nuclear tests. Now North Korea is cozying up to Russia who does have the capability.
Russia Plans Joint Military Drills With North Korea and Cuba
Top Norad general: North Korea has a nuclear-capable missile that can hit the US
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/13396131-large.jpeg
But No Public School Teacher is allowed to talk about it so how should he know?
Well, some teachers are allowed to talk freely about any science that is considered questionable.
I am a retired chem/physics AP teacher and was also department chair and a mentor to teachers locally.
I am easily able to visit classrooms, sometimes of former colleagues.
I am able to present facts, including
what I see as faults in the models, (have to keep things in basic terms), some of which have been discussed somewhat here on this blog.
Graphs , a little humor, and a few pics are always good.
But I try not to cherry pick or present something I know to be biased.
I somethings use articles from news papers to show how biased and incomplete they are.
Also, I want, many times over, to give credit to our host for the visuals he presents.
I have at times run in conflict with some influence from college or university instructors.
It is usually quite amazing, and I can’t emphasize this enough, how little they really know or understand.
That is, except for a few that would not bother to come to a high school in any event.