IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035

Climate Change 2007: Working Group II

“Glaciers in the Himalaya are receding faster than in any other part of the world (see Table 10.9) and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high”

AR4 WGII Chapter 10: Asia – 10.6.2 The Himalayan glaciers

The most recent Google Earth imagery is from 2020.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035

  1. So, now that the date is closing in, who gets fired and loses their reputation when this doesn’t happen?

  2. DD More says:

    Didn’t we go through this with Killimajarow and temperature was not the major factor. Dry weather & deforestation wass the cause.

  3. Disillusioned says:

    Interesting that the shadows from the Sun are in the exact same place. One would have to assume the satellite computer was set up to fly over exactly the same spot to take the photo at the same exact place in the sky, at the same time of day, but 13 years apart.

    Or… one might go to where my mind goes.

    • D. Boss says:

      Your mind’s conspiracy theory is both right and wrong. If you study Google Earth for a bit… (on a real, reasonably powerful desktop, not on a phone, tablet or weak laptop) you will find there are no or minimal shadows, and almost no clouds. How do they achieve this? By shooting many images over various orbits and making composite views that eliminate clouds and shadows.

      You can see shadows by engaging the sun and history features. But some shadow cannot be removed by compositing many images. Example is high enough latitude where the sun never gets to an overhead position.

      So yes the imagery is manipulated, but ground features that change generally are not altered. They can and do remove certain sensitive features during the compositing by using either old imagery or cutting and pasting nearby terrain over say sensitive military installations, etc.

      But it takes most considerably manual effort to blot out or change terrain features so a large percentage of the imagery is accurate, albeit with clouds, shadows removed or standardized.

      • Disillusioned says:

        It seems evident to me at least one of them has been manipulated, as it appears to have the same shadows as the other, but with one being more saturated/contrasty than the other. Objects in shadow appear bluish in the absence of sunlight. Those bluish-gray shadows do not appear eliminated at all – they’re on the right side slopes, going diagonally downward to the right, and they show up in both images.

        Perhaps I am misinterpreting what I am seeing – maybe they are not shadows – and as you assert, the shadows were eliminated along with clouds. But, they look like areas in shadow to me.

        Thank you for your perspective.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *