http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1988/1988_Hansen_etal.pdf
Gavin says :
the scenario closest to the observations is clearly Scenario B
So, I am trying to figure out – is Gavin spreading nonsense about CO2 growth, temperatures – or both?
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1988/1988_Hansen_etal.pdf
Gavin says :
the scenario closest to the observations is clearly Scenario B
So, I am trying to figure out – is Gavin spreading nonsense about CO2 growth, temperatures – or both?
“So, I am trying to figure out – is Gavin spreading nonsense about CO2 growth, temperatures – or both?”
All four I’d say.
That is one more than I wanted to give him credit for but I can see your reasoning behind that claim!
Scenario A assumes Gavin has the chart upside down.
Scenario B assumes Gavin is mentally impaired.
Scenario C assumes Gavin is lying again.
The scenario closest to the observations is clearly Scenario C.