Shirley tells us that it is all about faith in the global warming religion. Pay no attention to the historical record or the failure of alarmists predictions. Anyone with disagrees with the Climate Vatican is evil.
You have it backwards, Shirley. You follow in the tradition of bigots, witch burners and freedom haters, which have plagued humanity since day one. The climate is no more extreme now than in the past, and anyone who says it is has not studied the historical record.
If you believe that I am lying about something, than state the facts which contradict them. Calling someone a liar because they disagree with your religion, is as sick as human nature gets.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A5t5_O8hdA]
“No real bears left in a few more decades” would that ill informed prediction qualify as nasty ignorance?
Turn it down a few notches, honey.
SHOCK REPORT — Veterans Receive Letters From VA Prohibiting Ownership or Purchase of Firearms
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/shock-report-veterans-receive-letters-from-va-prohibiting-ownership-or-purchase-of-firearms/
If the Veteran is found to suffer from PTSD!
It’s what they want to believe. Perhaps for some of them their lives are empty. Apocalyptic faith gives them meaning.
It’s happened before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQba3ry4IBg
first of all, aren’t polar bears becoming a problem because there are too many?
More importantly this is the MO of the lemmings. You say to Shirley look at the charts, the innacuracies, the predictions that didn’t happen et al. She says ‘Your momma wears army boots’. She couldn’t hold a real conversation with you about climate change so she goes ad hominem. Shirley is the poster child for intolerance. If you disagree with someone start calling them names and bully them. Most likely this is what she claims she wants to get rid of, intolerance. There is a name for people like that.
The ‘experts’, who will have a discussion, prefer to cook the books.
Shirley, how can you support Drewski who was shown to be a liar and a fraud over John O’ Sullivan and also that he habitually moves the goal posts over numerous science papers I gave him that showed the Arctic earlier in the holocene a number of times had even less ice cover than now.
He simply can’t accept the possibility on what peer reviewed published science papers shows credible evidence of smaller than now ice cover extent in the Arctic in the current interglacial.This to me shows that he is another CAGW fanatic who has no regard for the scientific method and will say anything to rationalize away inconvenient science papers.
He is not worth defending.
To Shirley, RC Smith, David Appell, Dana, and several other trolls,
Before you call Steve, me, and many others liars, you need to duplicate our work and show how we are lying. I realize that you would need to learn something about computers other than how to type on one, but it isn’t that hard. What is hard, is learning to think for yourself. Anyone with a bit of gray in their hair and that has observed the world, knows deep down in their gut, that sea level is not catastrophically rising, that Greenland and Antarctica aren’t and can’t catastrophically melt, and that a slightly warmer world is a better place to live. Go back and read the Chicken Little, and Cry Wolf stories, and try to figure out why those were written. If you can’t figure that out, you have no right to criticize us.
Fortunately they do have a right to criticize as do we. It is just that their criticisms have no merit as they are not based on evidence or logic.
You’re right, Margaret. I should have written, no reason to criticize us.
If New York would be under a mile of ice they still would say it’s because of man made global warming.It looks like your blog hits them where it hurt most.
It’s impossible to reason with the die-hard Warmists. They are convinced beyond a doubt — and despite the facts — that CO2 (approximately 0.38 percent of the atmosphere) is responsible for a coming global meltdown. They don’t want to be confused with the facts (for example, the undeniable observation that there has been no statistically significant warming for 17 years). Their doomsday beliefs have morphed into a religious doctrine, and those who question their “end of days” theology are treated as heretics.
Somewhere among the radical Warmist cult there is another Torquemada waiting to burn skeptical “unbelievers” at the stake.
CO2 % is not 0.38%, it is 0.038%
1% = 0.01
0.1% = 0.001
0.01% = 0.0001
0.001% = 0.00001
0.0001% = 0.000001
0.0380% = 0.000380 = 380ppm
http://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/PPM_to_Percent.htm
My current favorite line:
“It is useless to attempt to reason a person out of a thing that they were never reasoned into”
Leslie Nielsen the funniest straight man on the screen.
As for Shirley – sounds like my dumb sister.
Drewski’s mom to the rescue! 😆