The Berkeley Earth “lead scientist” spreading more propaganda on Twitter.
Berkeley Earth is run by a fraudster who claimed to be a climate skeptic – in order to obtain funding.
I would love to believe that the results of Mann et al. are correct, and that the last few years have been the warmest in a millennium.
Medieval Global Warming – MIT Technology Review
I was never a skeptic
I’ve been pointing out for several days that ice extent is hardly changing in the Arctic.
Index of /DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/north/daily/images/2018/08_Aug/
It is starting to show up in the MASIE graphs. More heartbreak for Arctic alarmists.
Charctic Interactive Sea Ice Graph | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis
Five centuries later, climate science is still based on witchcraft and superstition about bad weather.
The havoc caused by this natural disaster was so great, so unprecedented, that soon an unnatural origin for the storm was proposed.
Medieval Witch Hunts Influenced by Climate Change – Scientific American Blog Network
The only difference now is that people involved in climate witchcraft have a slightly different superstition, and the ability to propagate their madness much faster.
I’m looking at what has caused the spike in temperatures in Canada the last five years.
There are only 85 stations in Canada which were active in both 1950 and 2017, and many of these have intermittent data during that time.
I found another flaky station, which since 2014 is reporting many fewer days, and seems to be losing all of the low temperatures.
It doesn’t take very many stations like this to create a large fake upwards trend.
National Geographic published this map in 1971, showing the extent of Arctic sea ice at the end of summer.
We are nearing the end of summer, and the ice in some regions is more extensive now than it was in 1971.
N_20180812_extn_hires_v3.0.png (1461×1740)
Arctic sea ice volume is fourth highest since 2003, and melting very slowly.
This is why NOAA hides the pre-1979 sea ice data. It wrecks their Arctic melting scam.
NOAA wants you to believe that time began in 1979, the peak year for Arctic cold and Arctic ice.
ftp://ftp.oar.noaa.gov/arctic/documents/ArcticReportCard_full_report2016.pdf
The graph below explains how climate alarmists do their junk science.
August 13th afternoon temperatures have plummeted in the US over the past century, as has the frequency of hot days.
On this date one hundred years ago, almost the entire US east of the Rocky Mountains was over 90 degrees.
On this date in 1936, the average US afternoon temperature was 93 degrees. Kansas was 119 degrees, Oklahoma was 116 degrees, and Texas was 114 degrees.
On this date in 1944, two thirds of the US was over 90 degrees, and there were 100 degree temperatures coast to coast.
Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts
Richard Feynman
Tamino has acknowledged that my graphs are accurate, but says the data has to be tampered with because of changes in average station latitude. He also says we need to trust the experts.
USA Temperature: can I sucker you? | Open Mind
Rather than trusting the experts, let’s actually look to see if Tamino’s theories are correct. If we look at only the set of stations which were active in both 1918 and 2017, we see a nearly identical trend.
The average latitude of this set of 720 stations, has moved slightly closer to the equator, so it should produce an artificial warming trend and works against his theory. The average latitude changes, because not every station reports every day.
The percent of hot days at this stable set of stations has also declined.
Tamino also complains that I should include warming which occurred before the last 100 years, even though it had nothing to do with CO2. That theory doesn’t hold up either, because summer afternoon temperatures have declined since the start of records in 1895.
A few years ago, Tamino made a blog post saying that I was lying about increasing winter snow cover. He continues to bat 0.000, but his readers continue to believe his BS.
Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab
Tamino is making progress however, admitting that my graphs are accurate representations of the data. Data tampering by NOAA is junk science.
Let’s see if Tamino posts my response.
