“It’s not helpful to have people disputing science”
– Jane Goodall
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- John Francis on Back To The Future
- John Francis on Back To The Future
It can be risky and dangerous to dispute scientists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cLmuPluSqE
Sad to see Jane on the AGW bandwagon. She showed that Apes in general were more
like us than we ever imagined. She wrote that down, even f the data didn’t fit the theory.
But , Dogma or the susceptibility to it must be ingrained.
Like when her chimp troop broke up and one side became”they who live by the
river and peel bananas with their feet!” and war,ensued.
She has her Banana at the ready here…