Given time lags of 30-50 years, we might have already put enough extra greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to have crossed a threshold to these bombs exploding, their released greenhouse gases leading to ever accelerating global warming with future global temperatures maybe tens of degrees higher than our norms of human habitation and therefore extinction or very near extinction of humanity.
Over the last decade, temperatures have fallen. This is due to all the CO2 we pumped into the atmosphere 30-50 years ago.
So the temp rise in the early 1900s was put in place by CO2 from late 1800s. All the early 1900s cars caused the flat lining of temp in mid 1900s. THese guys are deeply maroonish bordering on purple.
The CO2 also shrank their ability to spell Antarctic correctly (amongst other spelling errors), as well as shrink their ability to find out that the Antarctic is not shrinking.
And I thought all this time Temperature drove CO2 with an 800 to 1000 year lag. When did that change?
I wish they’d finally concede that we’re beyond the point of no return so we can spend our time more productively than debunking them.
Right, if we are beyond the point of no return, let’s defund all these climate studies, because it’s too late for them to do us any good.
From the article…
“(T)he science is clear. We need not a 20% cut by 2020; not a 60% cut by 2050, but a 90% cut by 2030 (1). Only then do we stand a good chance of keeping carbon concentrations in the atmosphere below 430 parts per million, which means that only then do we stand a good chance of preventing some of the threatened positive feedbacks. If we let it get beyond that point there is nothing we can do. The biosphere takes over as the primary source of carbon. It is out of our hands,” George Monbiot says.
That’s right, a 90% cut in 19 years or we will all burn.
AGW = Alarmists Gone Wild.