Then he says that the other Stanford scientists are even worse than he is.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
Recent Comments
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on 622 billion tons of new ice
- conrad ziefle on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Big Pharma Sales Tool
- gordon vigurs on The Other Side Of The Pond
- arn on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on Deadliest US Tornado Days
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
While the reporter was reluctant to dismiss him as a crackpot, he should have stuck with his gut feeling like the rest of the real world
Quoting the article: “He would be easy to dismiss as a crackpot, except for the nagging feeling that he may be right.”
He was not right.
Dismiss him.
And yes indeed, he is a crackpot.
After 30 more years of the same nonsense, it is EXTREMELY easy to dismiss Erhlich as a crackpot.
Was he a snail darter? Is that some kind of cheap thrill?
“..Ehrlich seems to be remarkably cheerful..” This could be because:
His insanity causes him to smile all the time.
He’s laughing because he’s happy about how easily journalists swallow his nonsense.