Then he says that the other Stanford scientists are even worse than he is.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue
- Bullseye!
- It’s Getting Closer
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Jack the Insider on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- arn on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- Francis Barnett on El Nino To The Rescue
While the reporter was reluctant to dismiss him as a crackpot, he should have stuck with his gut feeling like the rest of the real world
Quoting the article: “He would be easy to dismiss as a crackpot, except for the nagging feeling that he may be right.”
He was not right.
Dismiss him.
And yes indeed, he is a crackpot.
After 30 more years of the same nonsense, it is EXTREMELY easy to dismiss Erhlich as a crackpot.
Was he a snail darter? Is that some kind of cheap thrill?
“..Ehrlich seems to be remarkably cheerful..” This could be because:
His insanity causes him to smile all the time.
He’s laughing because he’s happy about how easily journalists swallow his nonsense.