Then he says that the other Stanford scientists are even worse than he is.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
While the reporter was reluctant to dismiss him as a crackpot, he should have stuck with his gut feeling like the rest of the real world
Quoting the article: “He would be easy to dismiss as a crackpot, except for the nagging feeling that he may be right.”
He was not right.
Dismiss him.
And yes indeed, he is a crackpot.
After 30 more years of the same nonsense, it is EXTREMELY easy to dismiss Erhlich as a crackpot.
Was he a snail darter? Is that some kind of cheap thrill?
“..Ehrlich seems to be remarkably cheerful..” This could be because:
His insanity causes him to smile all the time.
He’s laughing because he’s happy about how easily journalists swallow his nonsense.