“If you want to see a serious discussion of climate science, go to the blogs. That is where all the action is.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Mike Peinsipp on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Robertvd on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- arn on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Apart from here it seems, to quote GregW in another thread
“Scott, I think the reason was humorous exaggeration”
when’s Steve’s silly blog post on the Arctic got up the nose of Scott who is serious on the matter…..
Humorous exaggeration = fun
Serious exaggeration = laughable
Is it true that all the glaciers in the Himalayas will be gone by 2035? The world’s top climate scientists say it is. They also say that the Arctic will be ice free by 2008/2013/2015/2018/2020/2030
Well, it certainly isn’t in political circles; most of them are too ignorant to bother with serious science.
Precisely!