“Actual science” is defined by models which have already failed miserably – like Hansen’s.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- arn on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- conrad ziefle on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- dearieme on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Gamecock on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on The Importance Of Good Tools
- dm on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
So I read the article and July’s “new evidence” for CAGW never came up oddly enough. Arguments, yes…and the regurgitated junk about extreme weather…but I don’t count that as new seeing as it’s been the main trumpet call since 2005 or so.
And the comments were pathetic…both the skeptics’ and the CAGW believers’ arguments had no weight whatsoever.
-Scott