Kevin Trenberth’s response to our paper, rather predictably, was:
“I cannot believe it got published”
Which when translated from IPCC-speak actually means, “Why didn’t I get the chance to deep-six Spencer’s paper, just like I’ve done with his other papers?”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Thing Of The Past
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
Recent Comments
- Tel on The Thing Of The Past
- GW on The Thing Of The Past
- Disillusioned on The Thing Of The Past
- dm on The Thing Of The Past
- Gamecock on The Thing Of The Past
- Richard E Fritz on The Thing Of The Past
- Disillusioned on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Disillusioned on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Gamecock on “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- roaddog on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
We must have gate keepers assigned to keep the likes of Spencer and Lindzen from publishing!!!
It’s interesting that the Kev thinks he’s qualified to comment on a study about sat. data by Dr. Spencer. Spencer even assists the Kev in solving his travesty puzzle and the ingrate just disses him.
In the long run, Trenbreth is going to be one of the most intersting characters in the CAGW story. He is conflicted because he can’t find the heat in the system even though he has both very good TOC data from Argo but makes presenentations at conferences justifying the “denier” term and the spouts off about blocking publication of a paper he disagrees with. I think that kind of character is known as one with the tragic flaw.
Trenberth seems to be intellectually challenged.
I love it when honesty prevails. 😉