http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/products/maps/acis/wrcc/YearTDeptWRCC.png
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
Let’s be fair, all that cold in the Dakotas is clearly the CO2, since everyone knows that CO2 causes warming, it’s obviously trying to be sneaky and hide in the slightly cooler areas.. And look at that warmth in Tejas! Warming!
That is a whole lot of extrapolation of surface temperatures in locations where there are no surface stations. If it is satellite data you can see the UHI effect even at the altitude the measure.