“In his statement, Gleick claims he committed this crime because he believed The Heartland Institute was preventing a “rational debate” from taking place over global warming. This is unbelievable. Heartland has repeatedly asked for real debate on this important topic. Gleick himself was specifically invited to attend a Heartland event to debate global warming just days before he stole the documents. He turned down the invitation.
Statement by The Heartland Institute on Peter Gleick Confession | Heartland Institute
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Didn’t he win the Climate Prat award for 2012? He certainly deserves it.
To Gleick, a rational debate is one where everyone agrees with him. When he knows they’re not going to, he turns down the invitation.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
“A mere apology is not enough to undo the damage.” – HI
Except in the bizarro, circle-of-life world of the five basic components to the scientific method of climate alarmism – 1 – lie, 2 – get caught, 3 – apologize using some lame excuse generally blaming others for causation, 4 – appear on the establishment media sympathetic talking head pity parties, 5 – achieve victim status. Rinse and repeat.
I’m not sure how Gleick will fare in the courts, but he will most certainly be held up as a pop-culture hero in the court of public opinion shaped by the establishment media. Which I believe was Gleick’s (and the rest of the Teams) goal from the beginning.of the CAGW scare – nothing to do with the climate and everything to do with self-promotion/enriching themselves.
In other news, a football coach somewhere in Alabama is suspended for stating the obvious to anyone with eyes to see; Michelle has a fat butt
Good luck generation zero…