I thought Obama was in control of the weather.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- CO?²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on CO?²
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
As soon as you stop using fossil fuel derives products and services you fool. đŸ™‚
I wish AGW alarmists like Johnson would put a sock in it. They’ve embarrassed themselves beyond redemption. But they continue to flog a non-existent bogeyman.
There is no human-caused global warming, and, contrary to the popular alarmist myth, CO2 (man-made or natural) doesn’t “trap” heat and cause the planet to warm. Fact: CO2 produced from fossil fuel is responsible for a whopping 0.117 percent of the so-called “greenhouse effect,” which, as any scientist worthy of the label knows, has absolutely nothing in common with the heating processes of a greenhouse.
There is absolutely no empirical evidence to support the theory of human-induced global warming. It’s an hypothesis born of manipulated computer models, not experimentation or observation.
But I don’t expect an unread ignoramus like Johnson to understand such complexities.
Koch can pay up as soon as you pay Koch the difference between your current income and that of a typical person of pre-coal days accumulatively for each generation of your family since coal went into wide spread use, and I don’t think that you have that much cash.
This Johnson character must “tweet” by telepathy or 2 cans and a string fossill fuel being such a nemesis amd all.
I thought it was Bush’s fault.
David Kock is an evil right-winger and you’ll never get a penny out of him. Al Gore on the other hand has just made hundreds of millions out of Big Oil and would be glad to share it with the helpless victims of climate change and Hurricane Sandy.