Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- Disillusioned on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- John Francis on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Are the CIA at your door yet, guns drawn? Should be any minute now….
Yeah sure, I’m among the 15% of Americans who haven’t been “affected” by weather “disasters,” since 07′ Or do they count like one democrat 243 million times.
Connect The Dots is code for “The American Morons need visual aid to understand”.
It’s a typo – it was meant to be: “Connect-The-Dolts”
They can’t even spell correctly.
That is over 75% of the US population being ‘affected’ by weather disasters. Could he define ‘affected’ ? Because if he is using a reasonable definition such as lost or damaged assets such as homes, or lives or injuries, most of the US must be homeless or dead or not very healthy right now.
March golfing in Chicago qualifies.
Apparently “affected” means they live in the same county that were declared “federal disaster areas”. So it’s not based on actual empirical evidence; just whether some moronic bureaucrat decides to declare an area a “disaster”.
What does that even mean?
federal funds
Way too much money, then.
…and way too much power.
My response would have been – 243m affected by weather disasters before 2007 as well.
These Donk politicians are absolutely shameless. Expect this “stat” to take on a life of its own and be the next “97%”.
Shock News: The French are seriously pissed off with Americans. According to Suzanne Goldenberg, the Guardians Pulitzer wannabe, France will be shutting down most vineyards. Americans will be taking the vines to Yellowstone National Park!! The French don’t want to go to Germany or Poland. Last time Napolean did that he got his ass seriously kicked!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/08/climate-change-wine-production
Sorry, but I call absolute BS on Waxman here. What does this even mean? “Affected”? Like how I’m “affected” when my plane is late arriving from Boston because of weather? Does a delay due to a thunderstorm count? OMG–A thunderstorm–It’s a DISASTER I tell you. Send gov’t money and crush the SUV’s! We are being led by absolute pansy-_ss morons. “I wanted to go waterskiing, but it was cloudy outside and cold–what a disaster the day turned out to be!” Does that count? Can’t we save a bunch of money by buying these crooks off? I’d be happy knowing my tax money was going to support them–on a tropical island somewhere, with absolutely no role in gov’t.
Every American has been adversely effected by sh*t-for-brains legislation passed by idiots like Waxman. The weather is fine.