Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Climate Correlation
- arn on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- arn on “most secure in American history”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- conrad ziefle on “most secure in American history”
- oeman50 on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- dm on “most secure in American history”
- Dave Burton on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- Tel on “most secure in American history”
My Response To Waxman
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Are the CIA at your door yet, guns drawn? Should be any minute now….
Yeah sure, I’m among the 15% of Americans who haven’t been “affected” by weather “disasters,” since 07′ Or do they count like one democrat 243 million times.
Connect The Dots is code for “The American Morons need visual aid to understand”.
It’s a typo – it was meant to be: “Connect-The-Dolts”
They can’t even spell correctly.
That is over 75% of the US population being ‘affected’ by weather disasters. Could he define ‘affected’ ? Because if he is using a reasonable definition such as lost or damaged assets such as homes, or lives or injuries, most of the US must be homeless or dead or not very healthy right now.
March golfing in Chicago qualifies.
Apparently “affected” means they live in the same county that were declared “federal disaster areas”. So it’s not based on actual empirical evidence; just whether some moronic bureaucrat decides to declare an area a “disaster”.
What does that even mean?
federal funds
Way too much money, then.
…and way too much power.
My response would have been – 243m affected by weather disasters before 2007 as well.
These Donk politicians are absolutely shameless. Expect this “stat” to take on a life of its own and be the next “97%”.
Shock News: The French are seriously pissed off with Americans. According to Suzanne Goldenberg, the Guardians Pulitzer wannabe, France will be shutting down most vineyards. Americans will be taking the vines to Yellowstone National Park!! The French don’t want to go to Germany or Poland. Last time Napolean did that he got his ass seriously kicked!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/08/climate-change-wine-production
Sorry, but I call absolute BS on Waxman here. What does this even mean? “Affected”? Like how I’m “affected” when my plane is late arriving from Boston because of weather? Does a delay due to a thunderstorm count? OMG–A thunderstorm–It’s a DISASTER I tell you. Send gov’t money and crush the SUV’s! We are being led by absolute pansy-_ss morons. “I wanted to go waterskiing, but it was cloudy outside and cold–what a disaster the day turned out to be!” Does that count? Can’t we save a bunch of money by buying these crooks off? I’d be happy knowing my tax money was going to support them–on a tropical island somewhere, with absolutely no role in gov’t.
Every American has been adversely effected by sh*t-for-brains legislation passed by idiots like Waxman. The weather is fine.