Panetta: We’ve Lost Track of Some Syrian Chemical Weapons
Friday, September 28, 2012
The U.S. has lost track of some of Syria’s chemical weapons, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday, and does not know if any potentially lethal chemicals have fallen into the hands of Syrian rebels or Iranian forces inside the country.
Syria’s chemical weapons are top concern for the U.S. and for regional allies worried that they could lbe stolen by rebels or terrorists organizations, or given to Iran for safekeeping.
Panetta: We’ve Lost Track of Some Syrian Chemical Weapons | The E-Ring
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
And under those conditions, we’re now supposed to believe the Assad regime would be stupid enough to use such weapons–apparently, just as a cheap thrill, because it’s already winning its internal war. How would it expect to benefit–which, to any reasonably skeptical mind, leads to the question, who DOES benefit?
I have been saying this ever since the attack occurred. We are foolish if we get into this conflict now. It’s a lose, lose situation as I posted this morning. Keep up the good work in getting the info out to the uninformed.