Panetta: We’ve Lost Track of Some Syrian Chemical Weapons
Friday, September 28, 2012
The U.S. has lost track of some of Syria’s chemical weapons, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday, and does not know if any potentially lethal chemicals have fallen into the hands of Syrian rebels or Iranian forces inside the country.
Syria’s chemical weapons are top concern for the U.S. and for regional allies worried that they could lbe stolen by rebels or terrorists organizations, or given to Iran for safekeeping.
Panetta: We’ve Lost Track of Some Syrian Chemical Weapons | The E-Ring
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Jehzsa on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Greg in NZ on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Trevor on “records going back to 1961”
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
And under those conditions, we’re now supposed to believe the Assad regime would be stupid enough to use such weapons–apparently, just as a cheap thrill, because it’s already winning its internal war. How would it expect to benefit–which, to any reasonably skeptical mind, leads to the question, who DOES benefit?
I have been saying this ever since the attack occurred. We are foolish if we get into this conflict now. It’s a lose, lose situation as I posted this morning. Keep up the good work in getting the info out to the uninformed.