The animation below shows the changes from JAXA V1 to V2. Note how the 1980s minimum hardly changed at all, but more recent minimums have been increasingly reduced over time, particularly the last four years where they have made large reductions in ice extent. Hansen must be proud.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
At least they didn’t monkey around with the predictable endpoint of 2013, which tracks the 2008 “recovery” (not shown) with precision, and for the same (non-CO2 related & affected) reason!!!
new and improved….to show less ice
When they initiated the coastal algorithm, of course it’s going to show less ice…
They must have “adjusted” the past again to show that.
…so they lied again
The 1980s average max change is the big problem.
The article “North American moose dying at alarming rates” says “Winters have grown substantially shorter across much of the moose’s range”, “a longer fall with less snow”, and “when the temperature rises above 23 degrees Fahrenheit in winter, as has happened more often in recent years”. The link is: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/oct/24/north-american-moose-dying-alarming-rates-biologis/
Reblogged this on Edonurwayup's Blog.