In 1911, the consensus of climate experts determined that catastrophic climate change was caused by wireless communications
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cooling Is Warming
- Still Spamming And Scamming
- The End Of Snow
- 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- The End Of “Climate Action”
- Data Made Simple – Weather History Part II
- New Arctic Climate Discovered
- Airport Runways Cause Bad Weather
- Flooding Of January 1862
- Moving To Detroit To Escape Global Warming
- Visitech.ai – Data Made Simple – Weather History
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Cooling Is Warming
- conrad ziefle on 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Snow
- conrad ziefle on Still Spamming And Scamming
- dearieme on The End Of Snow
- dearieme on New Arctic Climate Discovered
- arn on Still Spamming And Scamming
- arn on Still Spamming And Scamming
- Brian G Valentine on Still Spamming And Scamming
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Snow
103 years later we have psuedo scientific morons saying the generation of electricity by carbon is dooming the planet’s climate. Climate science has come far…….not.
What is the perfect temperature for the planet?
H/T http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/03/07/a-pointed-question/
Where’s the Beef? (Evidence)
The climate experts of 1911 thought radio and the transmission of electricity was in process of causing catastrophic climate change. If they are anything like the climate experts of today, they may have demanded that we not continue the process of bringing and new forms of radio to the people. I could imagine that sensible citizens, before electrification projects across the globe would be tabled, would have asked these experts for evidence or a rational basis for their claim. And I could imagine that the 1911 climate experts would say “look, we can’t have perfect evidence, but society will be destroyed if we are right, so as an insurance policy it would be wise to eliminate electricity and radio transmissions.”
Very much like the climate
expertspoliticos of today. Even without any proof, with there in fact being zero evidence that CO2 affects climate temperatures, as an “insurance policy” they want to take a wrecking ball to industrial civilization, and the 1911 scientists would have done the same thing if they could have stopped electricity in its tracks.The most astonishing temperature jump took place north of 70°N in the Arctic from 1917 to 1940 (in the USA until ~1933); http://climate-ocean.com/2014/b/z_6.jpg .Arctic temperature increased about 5°C. It was presumably the biggest since the LIA.
Electricity is the cause of a part of the urban heat effect and maybe it creates some sort of plasma bubble. The Sun is a plasma bubble.
Dec. 16, 2008: NASA: Giant Breach in Earth’s Magnetic Field Discovered
“When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout,” ~ Chicken Little aka Bill McKibben
You are a bit late for the Oh my god the sky is falling dance.
…government weather bureau sharps have been detailed to look into the matter….
I remember back in the 1950s my grandfather blamed the wet summers (in Yorkshire!) on the atom bomb tests.
Nice find, Steve!
Forgive me for HAARPing on the “97% consensus” nonsense, but these “climate experts” would presumably have been counted among Peter Doran’s consensus of climate experts who agree that “human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures.” So they must be right. Right?
The horrific alternative is that Mankind has Sweet Fanny Adams to do with climate or weather.