Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
The most amazing thing is they don’t see the irony.
There were no cherries to pick because they were all killed because of the drought.
The Borg always claim we are doing what, in fact, they are doing. It’s their “look over there!” tactic of deception.
It’s called ‘projection’, and is part of the mental illness that is leftism.
Defense mechanisms. Their grinning cat in the tree. He knows everything, that cat. Lubos Motl pointed out last night that the whole Global Warming online army is but a couple dozen crazies. The rest of these blokes are justified by EVERY LAST OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC BODY ON PLANET EARTH supporting demonization of skepticism. Hate not, those who merely listen to the official source of Reason. Yes, it’s been corrupted. But several hundred years of good reputation still carries it on. It’s some odd structural glitch. A temporary one. It’s a wide world, lots of *different* types of people in it. Recently all the crazies have latched onto both pro-AGW *and* only pro-Skepticism. So be it. No, it’s not about facts any more, but that’s not a call to drop the facts! Things come in waves. But there is no analogy these days to pre-NAZI days. Sorry. It’s more decadent than that, not desperate. It’s sometimes just like sports on TV. A culture war, just for the hell of it. A spectator sport. Blah.
Agreed for society, but this “spectator sport” becomes much more than that when expensive, regressive policy decisions follow.
The pre-NAZI days included gun confiscation and hyper-inflation. We are not far from either at the moment. At least from the attempt, that is. Apparently most gun owners in New York and Connecticut are not submitting to unconstitutional registration laws, a bad sign for Democrats. We have the immorality and corruption parts of the Weimar Republic down pat, especially as regards to government and big business. There is no scientific left in climate science, anymore. It’s all about wealth transfers from the poor and middle class to the Democrat “Elite.” Scumbags.
With people dying in the UK from ‘Fuel Poverty’ it isn’t a spectator sport. With food riots in 60 countries in part because of biofuel it isn’t a spectator sport. It is deadly serious and people are dying because of it. And the rest of us are being raped of our wealth.
Just because you picked the whole damn orchard, doesn’t mean it isn’t cherry picking! … ROFLMAO … 🙂
…and he *still* doesn’t get it. Sheesh.
And so were the 50’s!
You picked the 30s decade instead of “averaging” it out. That is what the idiot is saying.
Goddard didn’t pick the 30s decade; it stands out on its own. That’s the whole point.
…in other words, it’s not cherry picking, it’s pointing out a cherry (inarguable, that is) fact.
And not just any cherry, but the one cherry that can be seen from across the valley, and picked out of the entire orchard. How someone could contend that Steven is “cherry picking” with this, is beyond my comprehension.
That is discrimination!
(Forgot the /sarc tag – I know what Steve did – it is called observation).
The stupid: it hurts.
Don’t you understand? Mann-made cherry-picking is science. Use of all real data in context is cherry picking.
From the Dictionary of CAGW Double Speak: “Cherry pick”: a phrase meaning “to present verifiable data”.
I would like to add this following information, global warming is happening whether you like it or not, are you arguing it is not happening or it is not man made please clarify deniers??
Link one: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/#gtemp
LInk two: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/
Link three: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh%2Bsh/index.html
And a link to explain about cherry picked data.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/petergleick/2012/02/05/global-warming-has-stopped-how-to-fool-people-using-cherry-picked-climate-data/2/
Thank you.
Those who resort to juvenile ad hominems have only proven they lack both the intelligence and knowledge to honestly discuss and debate issues.
You have thus proven yourself to be ignorant, and perhaps stupid.
Nothing is being denied. There is nothing to deny. The facts are as presented. Try sticking to them.
This is for the childish name caller – http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1987/to:2015/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:1987/to:2015/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/rss/from:1987/to:2015/plot/rss/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/hadsst2gl/from:1987/to:2015/plot/hadsst2gl/from:2002/to:2015/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1987/to:2002/trend/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:1987/to:2002/trend/plot/hadsst2gl/from:1987/to:2002/trend/plot/rss/from:1987/to:2002/trend
Try to learn.