Global temperatures have been plummeting, and are almost back to where they were at the start of the satellite era – during the coldest winter ever in 1979. Yet NOAA and the rest of the climate liars are trying to keep the global warming scam alive.
rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_tlt_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_3.txt
You forgot to include the upward sloping trendline that shows the earth has warmed more than it really has.
Only a complete moron (i.e. a climate expert) would start a linear trend line at the bottom of a sine wave.
Are you suggesting that climate experts are morons? I always assumed that they purposely manipulated the data and drew misleading trendline.
You can’t lump them all together like that. Some of them are morons, and some of them are liars. They can go either way, they do have free will you know.
Clearly the standard for climate “scientists” were dropped in the early ’90s when a veritable flood of govt $ sharply increased the number of positions. But about that time we get statements, well circulated within the climate circles, by the likes of Stephen Schneider who said “we have to offer up scary scenarios… each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective and being honest,” and Senator Tim Wirth who said “we’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing.” Wirth and especially Schneider and many others were saying in big bold letters: LIE!, or fabricate, just make scary sh!t up. Despite the disastrous consequences that would ensue with the 80%+ CO2 cuts demanded by the fear mongers, you can assume that nearly all of the post 1990 vintage climatologists have accepted the notion that the warmist policy prescriptions are the right thing to do regardless of the science, and so they think lying is ethically ok if it advances a much nobler goal. So the majority of them could be considered liars, but not usually good liars. Judging by the transparent stupidness of their fabricated “scary scenarios” and other lies, we can assume that many or most of them are also dimwits: moronic liars. An example, and these examples abound, of their obvious idiocy is this quote:
“If Canada proceeds [with its oil development]… Sea levels would rise and destroy coastal cities. Global temperatures would become intolerable. Twenty to 50 percent of the planet’s species would be driven to extinction.” -Jams Hansen, NASA, 2012
@Eric Simpson +1
Is remedial English on your schedule?
http://nollyprott.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/green-holocaust-tidied-up-after-first-publication-june-2012/
So essentially since 1940, we had maybe one 15 year period of actual warming. The rest of the time it has either been cooling or flat. Not very good evidence of a looming catastrophe that requires drastic immediate action.
It does indeed look suspiciously like a sine wave. Can I share a Nobel Prize now? I’ll buy my own frame.
One good thing about all the scurrilous and fraudulent adjustments, the modelers then tune their models to backcast the adjusted dataset which means there’s no chance in heck that they’re gonna accurately predict the future, not that there was much of a chance anyway, cf. Weisenbaum, von Neumann, et al.
Our president got a Nobel Prize for doing far less!
Wow, this comes as a good surprise for me!
I didn’t know that we “skeptics” were doing so well already- at least in February! 🙂
Look how the recent winters, with high snowfall and Arctic ice reaching average (or close to it) since 2008 are taking their toll on the warm temps of the first decade of this century.
I’d like to see the other months too, but as usual thanks Steve for opening our eyes to the truth.
NH warmists look forward to summer when GW will again raise it’s ugly head. I predict a high of 80ºF somewhere in West Texas by July 1.
You heard it here first….
(I was going to predict 90º, but a second look at the sine wave caused me to reconsider.)
I bet that if RSS had data since the XIX century it’d be very similar to the AMO graph,
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Amo_timeseries_1856-present.svg
I mean, in the remaining years too.
When are you going to admit to picking data sets on wood for trees that fit your argument?
That is the entire RSS data set, you moron.
stevengoddard please, take the high road. Shame on you for calling people morons.
Steve, come clean. You have to be using sock puppets. Nobody can be that stupid.
“KochSuckers(@VernonClathrate” Takes one to know one, I guess.
Yes Steve, stop using real observations, climate science does predict.., scratch that, foreca.., scratch that, computer model scenarios, ya, that’s the ticket.
Cooling will produce the extreme events which Climastrologers are trying to locate and attribute to warming. If their solutions are implemented, they will exacerbate the starvation and deaths by hypothermia the cooling will cause on its own. Wrong solutions to the wrong problem wrongly diagnosed and labelled. And they wrongly think their problem is wrongly communicating the wrong message? Wrong!
Read the Club of Rome report, entitled The Limits of Growth, published in 1972.
EVERY AMERICAN should read this author’s book(s): Servando Gonzalez
1) Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People
http://www.alibris.com/booksearch.detail?&invId=12150958995&pwork=0&pisbn=9780932367235&utm_medium=bookpricesite&utm_source=bookfinder&utm_campaign=na
2) I Dare Call It Treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of America, by Servando Gonzalez
http://www.alibris.com/I-Dare-Call-It-Treason-The-Council-on-Foreign-Relations-and-the-Betrayal-of-America-Servando-Gonzalez/book/24536173
Report from Iron Mountain has an even better understanding, calling for “false” pollution data to scare the world into an NWO controlled society.
Available check Google.
Lots of dis-info a la Protocols of the Elders of Zion, to disavow ownership.
I have an original copy.