SIGNIFIGANT RISE IN SEA LEVEL NOW SEEMS CERTAIN – NYTimes.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on Erasing 1921
- conrad ziefle on Erasing 1921
- Russell Cook on President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Crashex on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Allan Shelton on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Luigi on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Luigi on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- D. Boss on Warming Toledo
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
Gee, this is a short enough timeline that wagers could be made (and won!) in my lifetime …
.
The article is from 1986. Are you planning on making it to 2016?
Do you think liberals are actually going to check the publication date? If the NYTimes ‘prints’ it, it is true (in the minds of the libs).
Climate quackery keeps going because media is being used by vested interests who keep writing doomsday press releases, misinforming the public. Real science doesn’t predict the future, but science fiction does. Everybody thinks “science is smart and the experts are always correct.” Wrong.
“But let’s err on the side of caution. Climate = the environment anyway” — Wrong. Focusing on faux science takes our eyes off the real problems affecting environment, such as 3rd World development by globalist interest groups — which makes pollution and CO2 even worse, not better. China is the development model for Africa, etc. to “open up new markets” for globalists. Climate change and CO2 are a convenient non-ideological “enemy” used to mount their agenda and will unwittingly ruin the environment even more.
One real problem being ignored is coastal engineering, or meddling on Atlantic by Army Corps of Engineers, in Everglades, Intracoastal Waterway, manmade barrier islands, deeper harbors for bigger ships, the Chesapeake Bay bridge-tunnel and increased inland urban sprawl rainwater runoff to the coasts. This is why Atlantic side varies from place to place, the water levels. But no such changes on the Pacific coast, where less meddling happened. There’s no Everglades or Intracoastal on Pacific coast.
See: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastal_management
+++
Science is never “settled” by a consensus. Einstein and Galileo upset their times in what’s called a Paradigm Shift: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm_shift
Global warming is like “cold fusion” in the 1980s, example of Pathological science: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_science
One place where we haven’t seen any sea level rise is Australia, and everywhere else. Here’s a story: Australian Prime Minister Seeks Alliance Of “Like-Minded” Countries To “Dismantle” Obama’s Climate Policy…
http://weaselzippers.us/189091-australian-prime-minister-seeks-alliance-of-like-minded-countries-to-dismantle-obamas-climate-policy/
Australian Alarmists are in a real flap over this. It’s almost as if they want us all to be completely broke!
Tallbloke had a good guest post on the NY times vested interest in CAGW.
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/martin-cohen-new-york-times-has-vested-interest-in-climate-alarmism/#more-10301
Reblogged this on vuurklip and commented:
Are you scared yet? Will the Cape Flats be inundated? Relax, this NY Times dire warning dates from 1986! So we still have two whole years to prepare for the “worst”
I’m not sure about the NY Times calculation on sea level but, I’ve calculated the rate of change in Antarctic Sea Ice Extent over the past five years – It’s growing at a rate of over 4 Million Sq Km per decade! Feast your eyes.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.antarctic.png
IF IT CONTINUES IT WILL BE IN TASMANIA BY 2100, IN SYDNEY BY 2150 AND HAWAII NOT LONG AFTER THAT! OH, THE CHILDREN!
(sotto voce: It’s exponential, as is everything alarmist.)
Now why are alarmists not partying in the streets singing Kumbaya and dancing “The Carbon Tax Polka”?? Do they remain in denial that the sea ice extent is actually growing?
Doubting Thomas’s!
Only 2 more years for the other 270mm of sea-level rise? Heavens!
Eric Eckholm still writes for the NYT. I wonder if he is embarassed? Someone should ask him.
Look at this Article… What’s most stunning to me is they ADMIT Global Sea Level actually dropped… All in the midst of proclaiming Biblical Flooding… I don’t recall the Left halting it’s proclamations about Sea Level rise in 2010 or 2011…. Never heard anything except that melting and Oceans rising had accelerated!!
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/floods-in-australia-briefly-slowed-sea-level-rise-study-finds-16373
The explanation offered is ridiculous… As if teenie Australia could absorb Enough water to affect Global Sea Level… It’s as if they searched far and wide for anything… Any excuse to cover their asses… Alarmists claim the cold spell here in the USA was an Anamoly … Didn’t affect global temps… Yet we’re supposed to believe this study claiming Australia is some kind of reservoir for 7mm worth of the Worlds Water…
Cut the funding NOW… This is crap…