Editorial : Cancel Groundhog Day

February 2 is forecast to be -6 F in Punxsutawney, and the last thing we want is for Phil to get frostbite.

ScreenHunter_6393 Jan. 24 22.42

Precautionary principle says to cancel groundhog day until the end of the next ice age.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Editorial : Cancel Groundhog Day

  1. ossqss says:

    I concur. It seems frivolous anyhow. Burrrrr !

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSVeDx9fk60

  2. rah says:

    Hey that rodent has a better record at predicting winter than NOAA has in forecasting the number and severity of hurricanes during the season.

  3. Chewage says:

    Our pal Joe Bastardi has news for the early Spring lovers and it isn’t good…

  4. philjourdan says:

    If we have to go out into it, so does he. Suck it up Phil!

  5. ren says:

    This print resolution image shows one cross-section of the age of the Greenland Ice Sheet as determined by MacGregor et al. (See citation under the “More Details…” button below) Layers determined to be from the Holocene period, formed during the past 11.7 thousand years, are shown in Green. Age layers accumulated during the last ice age, from 11.7 to 115 thousand years ago are shown in blue. Age layers from the Eemian period, more than 115 thousand years old are shown in red. Regions of unknown age are filled with a flat gray colour.
    http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a004200/a004249/GIS_periods.06429_print.jpg
    http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details.cgi?aid=4249

  6. R2Dtoo says:

    We shouldn’t change ground hog day – it is too much fun, and could be made more accurate by having two official ground hogs. I recommend one in NY, named Gavin, and one in Colorado, named Kevin. Together, they could greatly improve spring forecasts!

  7. rachase says:

    Speaking if Gavin, have you seen this factual rebuttal to a swarm of unfactual criticisms by alleged scientists (including Gavin) of a peer reviewed paper refuting predictions by current climate models?

    http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/25/monckton-fires-back-point-by-point-rebuttal-at-warmist-critics-of-new-peer-reviewed-study-shoddy-rent-a-quote-scientists/

    • Gail Combs says:

      They should know better than to tangle with lord Monckton. He does such a nice job of handing them their A$$.

      Oh for a government that is not corrupt!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *