With the Northeast facing up to two feet of snow this week, the Union of Concerned Scientists has this 100% fraudulent document on their web site
Across the Northeast, from Pennsylvania and New Jersey northward to Maine, signs of our rapidly changing climate
become clearer each year. Records show that spring is arriving sooner, summers are growing hotter, and winters are becoming warmer and less snowy
Annual snowfall in the Northeast has been close to the long term mean of 100 cm in recent years
The percentage of 100 degree days has plummeted in the Northeast over the past 120 years.
The “Union of Concerned Scientists” is committing fraud, yet again.
Fraud is intentional. Incompetence is merely incompetence.
Phil, at this point it is FRAUD there can no longer be any question about the fact CAGW is politically motivated FRAUD. So lets start calling a spade a spade.
The censoring of skeptics, firing of skeptical scientists, the constant fudging of data to support the failed CAGW conjecture, the denial of funding for any studies EXCEPT CAGW says FRAUD in huge capital letters.
Twenty years ago it might have been ‘incompetence’ but after the last IPCC report showing ALL the climate models flunked the reality test . After Donna Laframboise crowd sources Audit of the 2007 UN Climate Report found
No one except those with an agenda can now back CAGW.
As Donna recently said “If the IPCC was a scientific body, the science section of its upcoming report would be summarized by scientists and that would be the end of the matter. Instead, the science summary will be the battleground at a 4-day political gathering.”
SO it is POLITICAL!
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” – Ex-senator Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation and the guy who brags about colluding with James Hansen into tricking Congress into believing Global Warming and theferfore ratifying the UN Framework on Climate Change.
Wirth is now working for the guy who said
“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and the UN Foundation
”The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization we have in the US. We have to stop these third World countries right where they are.”
Michael Oppenheimer
Environmental Defense Fund
”Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
Professor Maurice King
”Complex technology of any sort is an assault on the human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.”
Amory Lovins,
Rocky Mountain Institute
”The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil.” —-Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview
“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” —Dr. Paul Ehrlich, Anne Ehrlich, and Dr. John Holdren, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, 1970, p. 323
And this idiot is the science guru in the US?
“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams,
free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.” – David Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
And this one is REALLY SCARY
“The climate crisis is not a political issue, it is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity. It is also our greatest opportunity to lift Global Consciousness to a higher level.” —Al Gore, Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech
These people are not scientists they are Fanatics with an agenda and that agenda is really really bad for the rest of Humanity.
Gail I agree about CAGW. However those pushing it fall into 2 camps. Fraudsters and incompetents. They may be fraudsters. But they come off more as incompetent simply due to the stupidity of their statements.
Certainly both are possible. One would think these incompetent frauds would not have such success with their deception, but then again…Gruber..?
Yes, and who did Gruber fool? He boasts about it. But when it comes right down to it, it was only the democrats (liberals) who supported it and voted for it – very similar to the CAGW fraud. It does not divide along party lines, only insofar as where the majority of morons are.
Never overlook option 3: Deliberate disinformation.
Hew Manatee, I agree it is deliberate misinformation.
It is not incompetence at this late stage in the game. We see too many ‘Believers’ come onto this and other websites and spout all sorts of nonsense trying to influence the fence sitters.
You can never nail them down they just run in another direction spouting another line of misdirection. There is no argument of facts because they KNOW the facts do not support them but they NEED CAGW to scare the Sheeple into the direction of a world government run by unaccountable bureaucrats.
See Dr Evans Climate Coup — The Politics
Heck, the rough draft of the last IPCC Report showed there was no real global warming and the sun had a larger effect than was first thought. So the POLITICIANS spent four days rewriting the summary for policymakers and the scientists were then directed to change the scientific report to conform with the POLITICAL CONSENSUS!
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
Dr Richard Tol: “The IPCC attracted more people with political rather than academic motives. In AR4, green activists held key positions in the IPCC and they succeeded in excluding or neutralising opposite voices.”
Dr Eduardo Zorita: “Editors, reviewers and authors of alternative studies, analysis, interpretations, even based on the same data we have at our disposal, have been bullied and subtly blackmailed.”
Dr Martin Manning: “Some government delegates influencing the IPCC Summary for Policymakers misrepresent or contradict the lead authors.”
Dr Philip Lloyd: “I am doing a detailed assessment of the IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science. I have found examples of a summary saying precisely the opposite of what the scientists said.”
Dr Hans Labohm: “The alarmist passages in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers have been skewed through an elaborate and sophisticated process of spin-doctoring.”
Dr Andrew Lacis: “There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department.”
Dr Chris Landsea: “I cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”
Dr Richard Lindzen: “The IPCC process is driven by politics rather than science. It uses summaries to misrepresent what scientists say and exploits public ignorance.”
Dr Fred Singer: “Isn’t it remarkable that the Policymakers Summary of the IPCC report avoids mentioning the satellite data altogether, or even the existence of satellites — probably because the data show a slight cooling over the last 18 years, in direct contradiction of the calculations from climate models?”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr David Wojick: “The public is not well served by this constant drumbeat of alarms fed by computer models manipulated by advocates.”
Dr Roger Pielke: “All of my comments were ignored without even a rebuttal. At that point, I concluded that the IPCC Reports were actually intended to be advocacy documents designed to produce particular policy actions, but not a true and honest assessment of the understanding of the climate system.”
Quotes from: https://grumpydenier.wordpress.com/2013/10/08/46-statements-by-ipcc-experts-against-the-ipcc/comment-page-1/#comment-1308
The devotees you speak about are the faithful – the incompetents. Do they ever convert anyone? No, because their fanaticism inevitably causes them to descend into a tirade of epithets and ad hominems. They are true believers. They make fools of themselves and crow about the imaginary coup they scored.
The fraudsters are the ones feeding them the information to spread. They are the ones getting rich. Do you think Apple is rich? He is just a mindless fool/tool. But Gavin is a fraudster. Not a very bright one, but one in a critical position of power so he must be brought into the hierarchy of the church.
And right on queue with this post – https://www.facebook.com/WxRisk/photos/a.148807335166533.25889.129478830432717/809532972427296/?type=1
Dave Toleris is a regional forecaster that is more accurate than any of the local talking heads and even the NWS! He is also honest and explains why he blows it on the rare occasions he does. He has a website – wxrisk.com, but his most up to date stuff is on his facebook page.
We’ll presume that there will be attempts to drum him out of the movement then?
He makes his living by being right, so I doubt he cares about being in the AMS. And if they drum him out, he still has his reputation to fall back on.
If anyone has any good articles on how long the RRR will persist off of California, I would love to read them.
Northeast!!!
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/overlay=mean_sea_level_pressure/orthographic=24.35,68.24,670
This really is a full court press.
I wonder how long it will be before Dear Leader declares a state of national emergency, tears up what remains of the Constitution, suspends the democratic process and declares himself Leader for Life. I think “Papa Doc Obama” has a certain ring to it.
This is the Plan:
1. Obummer, Al Sharpton and the rest of the Community Organizers have been priming the Useful Idiots (Blacks) to riot at the drop of a hat for the past six years.
2. The Department of Homeland Security has named American Conservatives as Terrorist Threats The report even states: “Militia members most commonly [are] associate with 3rd party political groups. It is not uncommon for militia members to display Constitutional Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarian material. These members are usually supporters of former Presidential Candidate [sic]: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr.”
3. The DHS purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of Ammo enough for a twenty year hot war in the USA. “…some of this purchase order is for hollow-point rounds, forbidden by international law for use in war, along with a frightening amount specialized for snipers…. DHS now is showing off its acquisition of heavily armored personnel carriers, repatriated from the Iraqi and Afghani theaters of operation…” Ralph Benko @ Forbes
4. The intensive militarization of America’s police forces
5. The evasculating of the Posse Comitatus Act, …the Posse Comitatus Act no longer provides the strong wall between the military and domestic law enforcement for which it was originally intended….
And finally the torch to set off the internal war:
The EPA’s War on Coal More recent evidence shows the collapse of the grid in the Northeast is looking surer and surer with a combination of shuttering coal plants, closing nuclear plants and the NIMBYs refusing to allow natural gas pipelines or plants to be built.
Remember the “Arab Spring” riots that “weakened government legitimacy and destabilized the country?? That is the goal.
If blackouts don’t work as a trigger there is an additional fall back position.
Skyrocketing electric costs. Skyrocketing Medical insurance costs, followed by Skyrocketing food prices. coupled by more loss of jobs thanks to the Spike in Regulations under Obama
The Math That Predicted the Revolutions Sweeping the Globe Right Now
People forget the passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act and it’s long term effect. The UK passed similar laws. One dairy farmer in the UK said all his neighbors quit and he now spends 60% of his time doing paperwork not farming.
The Food Safety Law has not been implemented yet but it will be shortly. At that point many US farmers will quit producing food or jack up the prices to pay for their increase in cost.
http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/
Costs of new food safety rules remain years away
January 5, 2013 (Three years is January 2016 just in time to effect the November presidential elections…)
*** This means you have to fence in your veggies and fruits to keep deer, mice and rabbits out.
Food Safety’s Scorched Earth Policy
This means not only fences but ripping out the Dust bowl era tree lines and grass strips used to control erosion.
Most of the 2.1 million farmers in the USA are small farmers. A few years ago before the USDA decided to include ‘Rent’ on the farm house as income in the calculations, the yearly income of an average farmer was a MINUS $14,000 a year!
From a more recent study
As the Chinese say, May you live in interesting times.
Thanks for sharing this and the links Gail. I keep trying to warn the farmers in the area.
Annie this is why I got out of selling meat animals and went with fiber animals instead. The USDA/FDA can fine you into bankruptcy and there is nothing much you can do. You don’t even know what all the regs mean or what new ones have just been written.
Remember the goal of the the IPC, or the International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council or International Policy Council for short, is a world wide monopoly on food. They are the ones behind the WTO Agreement on Agriculture that is the reason behind the Food Safety law.****
Another Way To Kill US Farmers: Seize Their Bank Accounts on Phony Charges
Rady is careful about the information she puts out. I have dealt with her as an editor of some of the stuff I wrote.
https://radyananda.wordpress.com/about/
https://radyananda.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/well-behaved-women-satan-shudders1.jpg?w=630
Big storm headed to the Northeast. Who will the admin blame this time?
Sorry WP put this down here. I was replying to your ‘This is the Plan’ and the northeast power grid.
Gail, A lot of that makes sense except for Point #1. Depending of a black riot is way too risky — all they do is loot, pillage and burn their own neighborhoods. Not much strategic value in that, and is only part of the “divide and conquer” strategy. Think “Boston Marathon” as the model – they have proved that they can quite easily shut down a major city and keep people cowed in their own homes. All they need is the suitable “events” to enforce that approach – and it won’t be anything as messy as a race riot.
Hew, I was thinking of the riots in Egypt that were part of the ‘Arab Spring’
Remember these people really do not give a rats behind if American cities are destroyed since it will cost money to rebuild and the banksters get to loan out that money. After all the goal is to completely destroy the USA and especially the US Constitution with its gun rights and freedom of speech.
As far as black riots go, do not forget that Al Sharpton and his buddies are quite capable of setting off coordinated riots in cities throughout the USA.
Why are the movers and shakers promoting a vile person like Sharpton? Remember these are the direct heirs of the people who also funded and backed Lenin in his overthrow of Russia. link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&feature=player_detailpage&v=XO0pcWxcROI&x-yt-cl=84503534
Forecast polar vortex shows attack of winter in the Northeast US and Europe.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_z100_nh_f240.gif
Here you can see the lock circulation, which will bring arctic air to Europe.
http://exp-studies.tor.ec.gc.ca/ozone/images/graphs/gl_dev/current.gif
Compare the fraudulent GISS temperature record to the snowfall record. The coldest periods in the early 20th century, a veritable ice age, produced well below average snowfall. Perhaps something is wrong with this temperature record.
Look at that statement guys by a group that claims to be ‘Scientists’ NOT GREEN PEAS or SIERRA CLUBBED
“Across the Northeast, from Pennsylvania and New Jersey northward to Maine, signs of our rapidly changing climate become clearer each year. Records show that spring is arriving sooner, summers are growing hotter, and winters are becoming warmer and less snowy…”
Just the statement “winters are becoming warmer and less snowy” can easily be shown to be bogus.
https://suyts.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/image87.png
https://suyts.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/image_thumb88.png?w=685&h=446
There has been a shift fto more snow in the fall and less snow in the spring. but that is reversing to more snow fall AND spring.
<b.OCTOBER
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/snowcover-nhland/201410.gif
But that less snow cover in late spring is showing a reversal in trend over the last four years.
MAY
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/snowcover-nhland/201405.gif
Also note the charts as usual start in the depths of the 1970s cold spell and even so the October snow fall has returned to the same as the 1970s cold times.
An actual scientist would have looked at these easily checked statistics and been a lot more scrupulous in how he worded a statement about that data.
The other chart:
https://suyts.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/image_thumb88.png
In case you don’t already know. When snowfall increases, that’s also a sign of global warming. According to global warmers, warmer winters means more snow.
Problem solved.