The percentage of rainfall events over 5 cm has not changed at Lubbock, Texas – despite all of Katherine Hayhoe’s hysterical nonsense.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
Mann: How the hell did this data NOT get adjusted… Jones?? Jones??
Jones: I’m working on it now Michael…
Gavin: This Goddard guy is a pain in the a$$ … the Flat Earthers are alive on Twitter asking me about the Drought today… Drought despite all the Rain… Jones.. data manipulate us back into a Drought will ya?
Jones: Click [Enter] … there.. Rainfall is gone guys… record Drought is back!!
Steven, what say you on this Arctic Sea Ice Data/Graph:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seasonal.extent.1900-2010.png
Now suddenly they have data from 1910?
Would be interesting to see what pre-determined model they based their pre-satellite non-data on.
Seriously, they are just making stuff up, yet again.
That graph pegged my personal BS meter as soon as I saw it…
The documentation for this graph explains that the data and procedures to derive this graph are speculative and the authors understand that confidence cannot be placed on the information in this graph.