The percentage of rainfall events over 5 cm has not changed at Lubbock, Texas – despite all of Katherine Hayhoe’s hysterical nonsense.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Gerald Machnee on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
Mann: How the hell did this data NOT get adjusted… Jones?? Jones??
Jones: I’m working on it now Michael…
Gavin: This Goddard guy is a pain in the a$$ … the Flat Earthers are alive on Twitter asking me about the Drought today… Drought despite all the Rain… Jones.. data manipulate us back into a Drought will ya?
Jones: Click [Enter] … there.. Rainfall is gone guys… record Drought is back!!
Steven, what say you on this Arctic Sea Ice Data/Graph:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seasonal.extent.1900-2010.png
Now suddenly they have data from 1910?
Would be interesting to see what pre-determined model they based their pre-satellite non-data on.
Seriously, they are just making stuff up, yet again.
That graph pegged my personal BS meter as soon as I saw it…
The documentation for this graph explains that the data and procedures to derive this graph are speculative and the authors understand that confidence cannot be placed on the information in this graph.