The percentage of rainfall events over 5 cm has not changed at Lubbock, Texas – despite all of Katherine Hayhoe’s hysterical nonsense.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
Recent Comments
- Caleb Shaw on 622 billion tons of new ice
- Bob G on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Bob G on 622 billion tons of new ice
- Gamecock on Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- conrad ziefle on Your Tax Dollars At Work
- conrad ziefle on Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- arn on Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Independent on 622 billion tons of new ice
- dm on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- conrad ziefle on 622 billion tons of new ice
Mann: How the hell did this data NOT get adjusted… Jones?? Jones??
Jones: I’m working on it now Michael…
Gavin: This Goddard guy is a pain in the a$$ … the Flat Earthers are alive on Twitter asking me about the Drought today… Drought despite all the Rain… Jones.. data manipulate us back into a Drought will ya?
Jones: Click [Enter] … there.. Rainfall is gone guys… record Drought is back!!
Steven, what say you on this Arctic Sea Ice Data/Graph:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seasonal.extent.1900-2010.png
Now suddenly they have data from 1910?
Would be interesting to see what pre-determined model they based their pre-satellite non-data on.
Seriously, they are just making stuff up, yet again.
That graph pegged my personal BS meter as soon as I saw it…
The documentation for this graph explains that the data and procedures to derive this graph are speculative and the authors understand that confidence cannot be placed on the information in this graph.