David Vs. A Pathetic Goliath

Alarmists get billions in funding. Skeptics get little or no funding. Yet the climate Goliath keeps insisting they are outnumbered.  Thus proving that science, facts and reality beats big money lies every time.

Minnesota was 117 degrees in 1917, but 90 degrees in 2017 makes Minnesota progressives cry like babies.  Pathetic little worms.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to David Vs. A Pathetic Goliath

  1. Kris J says:

    On the contrary, Sen. Franken, Big Oil actually seems to LIKE climate alarmism. They don’t like all this pumping of shale oil. Their profit margins go in the tank. All the Wall St. Journal talks about is how shale oil is driving down prices/profits and ruining the market.

    Franken’s just worried about his own funding…

    • rw says:

      One only has to check their websites to see what side they’re on.

      On the other hand, you use the same all-purpose explanation that Franken does. And that is perhaps the most interesting thing about this case of duelling explanations.

  2. Streetcred says:

    Al Franken … beneath the lowest common denominator. Bring in the TRUTH SERUM! Release the sharks with friggin’ lasers on their heads! (if you know, you’ll know ;-) )

  3. Griff says:

    Absolutely untrue..

    who funds the GWPF?

    How many people does Heartland pay out to?

    • gator69 says:

      Ms Griff, the genocidal alarmists get much more funding than any skeptics.

      The plaintive calls about global warming and loss of polar bear habitats, the stern warnings about rising seas and flooded coastlines – this is what the public hears about. Then there’s this pesky, inconvenient truth they don’t hear about: $1.5 trillion.

      “Interest in climate change is becoming an increasingly powerful economic driver, so much so that some see it as an industry in itself whose growth is driven in large part by policymaking, notes Don Jergler, an analyst for Insurance Journal, an industry publication.

      “The $1.5 trillion global ‘climate change industry’ grew at between 17 and 24 percent annually from 2005-2008, slowing to between 4 and 6 percent following the recession with the exception of 2011’s inexplicable 15 percent growth, according to Climate Change Business Journal,” he writes.

      “The San Diego, Calif.-based publication includes within that industry nine segments and 38 sub-segments. This encompasses sectors like renewables, green building and hybrid vehicles.

      And the talkers, creatives and handlers too.

      “That also includes the climate change consulting market, which a recent report by the journal estimates at $1.9 billion worldwide and $890 million in the U.S.,” Mr. Jergler says.

      Why do you hate poor brown people?

    • RAH says:

      Evidence Griff. Evidence! You continually make claims with none.

    • Rhys says:

      Heartland operates on about a $4 million budget of which climate science is one of four major initiatives they fund. So Heartland spends about one millionth the amount that is poured into promoting the global warming scam.

    • Andy DC says:

      How many college faculty positions are filled by alarmists compared to skeptics? How much media coverage is transmitted in behalf of alarmists compared to skeptics? The obvious answer to both questions is that the skeptics get a very tiny percent of what the alarmists get. If skeptics were truly rolling in big oil industry money, there is no way that could be so.

    • Sharpshooter says:

      regards the answers given.

      Typical clueless fascist (another favorite deflection: the Antifa thugs).

    • Sharpshooter says:

      By the way: has the GWPF or Heartland EVER been found fraudulently fudging /altering data? At all? Your bunch make a regular practice of it.

      What a malignant sub-human species.

    • Robert Austin says:

      Cognitive dissonance, thy name is Griff. Just cover your eyes and ears, Griff, and shout “big oil” repeatedly.

    • Gerald Machnee says:

      Griff, have you apologized to Dr. Susan Crockford yet????
      Waiting……….
      Griff, have you measured the temperature change caused by CO2????
      Waiting……….

  4. Jl says:

    Bozos like Franken unwittingly make the argument against their own side. If funding is somehow bad, who gets the most funding, by far? The alarmists. Al, you’re an idiot.

  5. -B- says:

    Standard leftist tactic to claim, to imagine they are fighting some giant overwhelming force and thus require government assistance. The trouble is that the forces are either imaginary or were never very strong and were defeated decades ago with a few cardboard cuts out being propped up for show. Additionally the leftist projects what he is doing on to his opposition. Since there is a big money machine behind alarmism they project that there is a big money machine against them. When all there is are individuals who see through their scam. No money, no fame, just an objective look at the data. Which is another thing that those who want power hate, objective truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.