Hacking The 2000 Election

Climate fraudsters Al Gore has made $500 million and a Nobel prize off his global warming scam, and he nearly stole the presidency in the year 2000. He was running far behind Bill Bradley in the Democratic primaries, so he put top Democratic criminal Donna Brazille in charge.

Brazille had been fired by Dukakis twelve years earlier for lying about George Bush Sr. having an extra-marital affair. As a professional liar himself, Gore saw that as a positive attribute, and hired Brazille to play the race card against Bradley and Colin Powell. Gore then blamed her bad behavior on the victim of her bad behavior.

Clearly, Gore is vulnerable on character and veracity. That is, he tells “checkable” untruths.

27 Jan 2000, Page 16 – Standard-Speaker

Fast forward to 2016, CNN and Hillary Clinton hired the same criminal, Donna Brazille, to hack the primary and steal the election from the voters – by giving Hillary debate questions ahead of time.

In 2o12, Obama was on the ropes for lying about Benghazi, so CNN colluded with the White House to hack the debates.

This criminal operation, known as CNN and the Democratic Party goes on generation after generation stealing elections from the American people. It is time for Congress to take action.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Hacking The 2000 Election

  1. garyh845 says:

    CNN had hacked entire presidential primary debates as well.

    “CNN Stocked Audience and Controlled Thursday’s [2007] Debate Questions.
    Here: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/17/cnn-stocked-audience-controlled-thursdays-debate-questions

    ” . . all six “undecided voters” set up to ask questions at the debate were plants.”

  2. garyh845 says:

    More on Obama’s claiming in the 2nd presidential debate to have labeled the Benghazi attack “an act of terrorism” the following day. The day after the attack
    Following Obama’s Rose Garden address on Sept 12th, 2012, Obama appeared on “60 Minutes” being interviewed by Steve Kroft. Note – this exchange was edited out of the CBS show that night – but then quietly re-released just a couple weeks before the election, on Nov 4th – Here.

    There was a some non-main stream media coverage about this, Here, but this is the way the MSM works . . the broad electorate never found out – it was never allowed to be a real discussion – MSM never brought it up again – never put anyone on the hot spot over it – but we all know that).


    If you listen carefully to the video there are two occasions during the first part of Steve Kroft’s question here, where Obama says, “right.” Needless to say, that would imply that Obama was agreeing with the specific words that Kroft was using. I’ve inserted them below, in [ ]’s:

    KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in [right] connection with the Libya Attack [right], do you believe that this was a terrorism attack?

    OBAMA: Well it’s too early to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.

    Yep – CBS edits that out of the broadcast interview with Obama. Why? They’ve got an election to hack from Romney.

    FactCheck.org – waited until the next April – 7 months – to check Obama on his statement. Found that he lied, and they gave him four Pinocchios.

  3. arn says:

    This Bradley/Gore stuff sounds so Sanders/Clinton.
    It seems that republicans always sack their nest horses in the race
    to put their best criminals at the top
    so that they can loose in the end.

    Thx god democrats have been corrupted on such a large scale
    that 90% of their voters don’t give a shit about all the scandals the complete sell out to banksters and corporations
    as long as they can hear :Religion of peace,LGBT,SJW,save the climate,etc crap.
    Just throw them a bone,make them feel guilty and give them a chance to get rid of the guilt by being tolerant to minority groups and they’ll stay forever in zombie mode.

    • gator69 says:

      Last week, more Americans tuned in to watch re-runs of “Yogi Bear,” “Full House,” and “Friends” on Nick At Nite than to watch Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon’s shows on CNN.

      Wow! Nick At Night and Yogi Bear, they really are losing their demographic.

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        To be fair, Cooper and Lemon had this idea how to fix their ratings but the feds said no.

        Park rangers: Stop snapping selfies with Yogi

        • gator69 says:

          Fake news!

          How do you know it was not this bear simply taking a family photo, only to get photo bombed by some pudgy, pasty and tasty white guy? And worse, many believe those bears are Russian, that this is all a setup arranged by Trump, and that these photgenic bears (who coincidentally speak no English) are sent here to influence our park policies.

          • AndyG55 says:

            (who coincidentally speak no English)

            Neither do many other Americans..

            … even when they think they are. ;-)

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            I’ll be stuffed!

            That what you hear down there, you big galah? Hundred clicks south of Whoop Whoop?

            Zip your gob and go to buggery! Put your back into it and give it some clout, mate! ?

          • AndyG55 says:

            See, CW,

            … you CAN make a coherent post when you try hard enough ;-)

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            I admit, it is hard work. How can you people talk like that without breaking sweat? ?

  4. GW says:

    But what are some potential actions congress could possibly take – that would not fail free speech protections ? Assuming sufficient votes could be mustered for anything. For better or worse, the Constitution doesn’t say you can’t lie. Or be wrong.
    In some ways it could be better this way, after all, had Romney won we would never have Trump. And Romney would likely have been even worse than Bush II. Flashback to 1980; Carter gave us Reagan and had Ford been re-elected in ’76 we would never have had Reagan.
    I loathe and detest the fake media, but perhaps things really do happen for a reason.
    Just sayin’………

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      I’ve always suspected the Lord had a penchant for the counterintuitive and a great sense of humor.

      • GW says:

        Oh Clearly he has a sense of humor !!! Or a sense of irony !

        Don’t believe it ???

        Western society – the Judeo-Christian world, was the first and is (at least for now) the most intense energy consuming society on the planet. And once our addiction to energy was irrevocable, where has the largest and most easily accessible source to that energy been located ???

        Under the Muslim controlled sands of theMiddle East !!!

        Chew on that for a while !

        • Kris Johanson says:

          Yes, up until 7-8 years ago. Now, the US has more known, reachable energy than all of them put together!

          • GW says:

            Not for motor fuels.

          • cdquarles says:

            Sure we do and we’ve always had them. For about 40 years we have had politicians who’ve never had the will to let the private industry go get them. Now we do.

          • cdquarles says:

            * the Reagan interregnum excepted. A question, why did it take nearly 40 years to remove wartime price controls off oil and gas production when the bulk of the rest were chucked within a decade? /rhetorical

  5. Anon says:

    And now we are expected to buy the “Russians Stole the Election” meme. But when it comes right down to it, Trump was a DNC / Clinton / Media creation – a Frankenstein (as they characterize him) that they created and can’t control or turn off.

    Quite simply, they corrupted their own nomination process, ensuring Sanders could never win, then did the same thing to the Republicans by telling their media allies to elevate Trump with $2 billion in free media coverage (pied piper strategy) drowning out all the other Republican candidates. In addition to corrupting the FBI & DOJ so the Clinton server investigation went nowhere.

    Their ace card was the Billy Bush sex tape (swift boat attack) which was supposed to bring Trump down. They had known about this tape for about a year before they released it, but decided to release it at the most advantageous time. Imagine if they had released it when they discovered it? Very unlikely Trump would have won the nomination or been anywhere near the oval office now.

    So had the Democrats run a fair nomination process and election, it probably would have been Biden/Sanders vs Bush/Rubio or some similar combination. Instead they engineered the whole election and the American people saw through it and handed them their ass. Trump is who the Democrats wanted all along, so the American people granted them their wish. Now they have to live with it. LOL!

    So it is not the Russians that are a threat to democracy but the Democratic Party. And just suppose the Russian’s did do what the Democrats accuse them of. Is that bad? Imagine if the WaPo got hold of Putin’s compromising emails and released them to the Russian people a month before the Russian election. There would a Pulitzer Prize in journalism for that. But the Russian’s get nothing for exposing American political corruption.

    Anyway, if the Russian’s did it, they ought to be admired, as they beat the Democrats at their own game. The Democrats just got out-hacked by the Russians in the end. Lol!

    I was a true climate change believer before all this. But I began thinking, if this is what the media and the Democratic Party did to the election, what might they be doing to the Climate Record? And this question led me to realclimatescience.com

    So in the end, everything is unraveling on them and deservedly so.

    • Eric Simpson says:

      “But I began thinking, if this is what the media and the Democratic Party did to the election, what might they be doing to the Climate Record?”

      Yup. Note this seminal quote:

      “We have to offer up scary scenarios… each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective [dishonest] and being honest [ineffective].” -Stephen Schneider, lead ipcc author, 1989

      At the inception of the IPCC their main man Schneider said, paraphrased: “make up bullsh|t.” Clearly, this would apply not only to their bs “scary scenarios” but into manipulating the climate record to make it a scary scenario too. It’s all bs. And they’re all a bunch of Bullsh|t Artists, every one of them.

      • Anon says:

        Eric, thanks for the reply. I suppose you have seen this already?


        The “How Climate Alarmism Advances International Political Agendas” section say it all.

        A few months, ago, I was truly shocked to read that, but suspected as much after reading Wikileaks.

        • Eric Simpson says:

          I hadn’t seen that. But I do have in my Word file some of the quotes that they cover in your link, as:

          “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing.” – leftist Senator Tim Wirth, 1993

          And what is “the right thing?” This:

          “A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States… [we] must design a stable, low-consumption economy.” -John Holdren (1973), Obama’s Science Czar

          “Isn’t the only hope for this planet the total collapse of industrial civilisation? Is it not our responsibility to ensure that this collapse happens?” -Maurice Strong, ex UNEP Director

    • Advocatus Diaboli says:

      Anon, you wrote that:

      “Their ace card was the Billy Bush sex tape (swift boat attack) which was supposed to bring Trump down. They had known about this tape for about a year before they released it, but decided to release it at the most advantageous time. Imagine if they had released it when they discovered it? Very unlikely Trump would have won the nomination or been anywhere near the oval office now.”

      This is very interesting. I’d like to show my lib wife the source for their knowing about the Billy Bush tape for a year before it was released. (She’s way more picky about info that undermines her faith than about fake news that props it up.) Could be a real bombshell.

  6. Eric Simpson says:

    I don’t know which would have been worse: Gore or Obama.

    Honestly I think it would have been better to have had Gore than to have suffered the unmitigated nightmare of Obama. At least we could have attacked Gore and his nutty policy ideas directly, without them saying “you’re a racist to attack the president. RACIST!!!”

    • Andy DC says:

      The 2000 election may have been the worst ever. Two total mental midgets and establishment puppets, Bush and Gore. Without their dads, neither one of them was capable of running a 7-11, let alone being President.

      The repeated bad choices left the door wide up for Trump.

  7. Andy DC says:

    Thw Democrats have devolved into a totally out of touch lunatic fringe party, who will increasingly be banished from power during upcoming elections.

    The Democrats showed such feigned horror about Trump’s tweets. The tweets are total genius. If the media refuses to cover Trump’s agenda, it seems quite obvious that he has to go over their heads directly to the people to get his message out. Maybe he could be a little more careful (or maybe not), but I believe Trump is winning in the long run.

  8. Chauncey Chapman III says:

    Tweet, drain, rinse, repeat

Leave a Reply to gator69 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *