Perjury, Conspiracy, Witness Tampering …

Report: Christine Blasey Ford Ally Monica McLean Pressured Leland Keyser to Change Denial of Brett Kavanaugh Assault | Breitbart

Monica McClean is the ex-FBI agent which Blasley coached on how to pass polygraph tests.

REVEALED: The Man Accusing Blasey Ford Of Lying About Polygraphs | The Daily Caller

And even more witness tampering.

NBC Owes Kavanaugh A Retraction For ‘Perjury’ Claim On Ramirez Texts

The swamp is in a bit of trouble ….

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Perjury, Conspiracy, Witness Tampering …

  1. I thought Ford was lying from the beginning,
    based on the suspicious timing,
    the fact she was a progressive / Dumbocrat,
    (truth is not a leftist value)
    strongly against another conservative justice,
    and the suspiciously “hazy memory” of every detail
    beyond the few details that were needed
    to blame Kavanaugh.

    When Ford suddenly “remembered” new details,
    the story became even harder to believe.

    For example, Ford claimed
    her best girlfriend was at the party,
    but she ran out and left her there,
    alone with three or four other boys
    (the number kept changing)
    as “fresh meat for the lions”,
    after she “escaped”
    from an “attempted rape”?

    What kind of girlfriend would do that?

    A liar, that’s who —
    a liar who didn’t think though
    her “story” when she added additional details,
    trying to make it sound more believable.

    My latest article on the Ford-Kavanaugh controversy,
    (and I sure hope he is confirmed, because
    he’s about as close to a “honest boy scout”
    as you could find for a Supreme Court nominee),
    is at the link below.

    http://electioncircus.blogspot.com/2018/10/why-i-believe-christine-ford-and-brett.html

    • Squidly says:

      I agree …

      One very simple thing did it for me right off the bat. TIMING!

      A real victim doesn’t even think about the timing. It is absolutely impossible for this to have been coincidental timing. This was calculated from the very beginning. Real victims and honest people do not do such things.

      End of story…

      • Squidly
        The very late timing was by horrible Feinstein.

        Ford’s letter was almost two months earlier.

        However, I forgot to mention that Ford
        wanted to derail Kavanaugh while
        remaining anonymous — that’s
        a sign of a bad character to me.

        An honest person would NOT want
        to be anonymous — they would want
        their good character to help “sell”
        their story.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      I agree, Richard. There were so many clues from the very beginning that this hit was a setup.

      • I’ve kept wondering why the original Ford letter
        had just the minimum amount of detail
        needed to smear Kavanaugh, and nothing more
        (that might be refuted … or had to be remembered).

        I think that was a plan
        — I believe Ford was helped
        with the “bare-bones” letter
        by a close friend
        Monica McLean,
        a former FBI agent.

        Ford was staying with Monica
        in Delaware (afraid of flying !!!)
        for four days as the letter was
        being composed.

        Here’s my article on the “conspiracy”
        between the two women — both
        far left progressives trying to derail
        Kavanaugh’s nomnination
        while remaining anonymous !!!
        http://www.ElectionCircus.Blogspot.com

  2. sunsettommy says:

    Here are a few links where the author Sundance does a smackdown on the Leftist attempt to derail Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination:

    Retired FBI Agent/DOJ Lawyer Ms. Monica McLean Attended Kavanaugh Hearing With Blasey-Ford…

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/retired-fbi-agent-doj-lawyer-ms-monica-mclean-attended-kavanaugh-hearing-with-blasey-ford/

    and,

    Christine Blasey-Ford Friend In Delaware Was Career FBI Agent and Likely Together During Accusation Letter Construct…

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/03/christine-blasey-ford-friend-in-delaware-was-career-fbi-agent-and-likely-together-during-accusation-letter-construct/

    and,

    Rachel Mitchell Memorandum and Analysis of Christine Blasey-Ford Testimony…
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/10/01/rachel-mitchell-memorandum-and-analysis-of-christine-blasey-ford-testimony/

    These links and more from the blog The Last Refuge, utterly destroys the leftist narrative to point that Dr. Ford and her “team” obviously and DELIBERATELY lied like hell.

    • Squidly says:

      Sundance has been awesome throughout this Senatorial debacle.

      • Windsong says:

        +10
        Like Tony, Sundance must never sleep. His thorough coverage on the whole FISA/”Russia”/FBI-DOJ corruption story has been superb. And that connection becomes very interesting because Ms. McLean’s own attorney is none other than David Laufman, a former DOJ National Security Division DAAG until he resigned abruptly early this year. And what do you know, David Laufman reportedly sat in on the Hillary Clinton FBI interview about email shenanigans in July, 2016.

        A political hit job orchestrated by Democrat operatives from the start.

      • Rah says:

        Here here!!!

      • Rah says:

        Or is it: Hear Hear! ? Ah well it’s 5:00 AM and I just woke up in a truck stop in Comber, Ontario. Finish this cup of coffee from my thermos and get cleaned up and head home. Got a border to cross and 280 miles till my weekend begins.

        • Disillusioned says:

          Have a great trip home. Happy weekend.

          • RAH says:

            My border crossing was the easiest I have ever done. Handed the agent my passport card and the US Customs “Lead Sheet”. He asked if I had anyone with me and then handed back the card and said “your good to go”!

            I had done deliveries and pickups in Burlington and Mississauga, ON. Had 23 Bills of Lading requiring paperwork that took 2 hours to complete. Friday afternoon rush hours are the worst. The stack of papers I handed dispatch on return for what was on the trailer was about 2″ thick. The first stop I dealt with a Chinese shipping clerk. At the second I think he was Vietnamese. First was a good guy and very helpful. The 2nd a self important jerk.

            Runs this week.

            Tuesday: Round trip from Anderson, IN terminal to telay trailer with a driver at Lebanon Junction, KY.

            Wednesday: Lear run up to their facility in Romulus, MI then down to their facility in Indianapolis.

            Thursday: Delivered wiring harnesses to a place in Bolton, ON then returned to the company terminal in Romulus, MI.

            Next morning (Friday) hooked to the preloaded trailer to take to Burlington and Mississauga, ON. Returned loaded trailer to terminal in Anderson, IN.

            I have been making Canada runs as needed for over 8 years now. During all that time there has always been construction on the Ambassador bridge. I hate that bridge and the SOB that owns it.

        • E.M.Smith says:

          Either oe is correct and both are used. Hear Hear endorsing the speech a bit more while Here Here is more endorsing the ideas and saying you are with them. But most folks don’t make any distinction.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Sundance is my go-to source on Trump’s fight against Democrats and their Deep State annex.

  3. Russell Cook says:

    Remember this famous Sidney Harris “then a miracle occurs” cartoon? http://magicanimation.com/misc/SidneyHarris_MiracleWeb.jpg

    What bothers me about Dr “not-a-licensed-psychologist” Ford is her transition out of anonymity. Senator Feinstein got possession of the letter which was supposed to be confidential (who by the way says the letter didn’t leak from her office), then some kind of miracle happened which enabled reporters to figure out whose house and classroom to arrive at, which then indicated to Dr Ford that she couldn’t remain anonymous any more.

    • Russell Cook says:

      …. FEINSTEIN: How did you decide to come forward?

      FORD: Ultimately because reporters were sitting outside my home and trying to talk to my dog through the window to calm the dog down, and a reporter appeared in my graduate classroom and I mistook her for a student, and she came up to ask me a question, and I thought she was a student and it turned out that she was a reporter. So at that point, I felt like enough was enough. People were calling my colleagues at Stanford and leaving messages on their voicemails and on their e-mail, saying that they knew my name. …..

      • paul courtney says:

        Russell Cook: Good point. I conclude that the anonymity was calculated, right through to going public. First, two congressional staff and Ford (and WaPo?) kept tight lid on this for 6 weeks, as the nom looked certain. Think on that. Her story makes it sounds like she was forced out rather suddenly, yet she had her ducks in a row- notes from counselor from 6 yrs ago, check; polygraph done, check; top national activist attorney (or two) instead of sweaty Palo Alto divorce atty, check. Ford was not pushed out, she was rolled out. The demand for “anonymous” was scripted, and when DiFi gave the signal, the script called for going public.

    • Phil. says:

      Not only does Feinstein say that the letter was not leaked from her office but so does the journalist who broke the story. Regarding the ‘some kind of miracle’ on July 6 Prof. Ford texted the Washington Post ‘anonymously’ via WhatsApp, however that means that WaPo would know her phone number and it wouldn’t take very long to get her identity, the first story about it referred to a “person affiliated with Stanford University” and the existence of the letter. The contents of the letter weren’t revealed until someone read it to CNN, 4 days after it was sent to the FBI.

  4. AndyDC says:

    These unhinged, defeat at all cost politics, in complicity with formerly “respected institutions” of the MSM, is unprecedented and extremely dangerous.

  5. Mr Sir says:

    Mitch McConnell and other Republicans: The Democrats are being obstructionists with Kavanaugh.

    Me: Does the name “Merrick Garland” ring a bell to you hypocrites?

    • Gator says:

      Yeah, it does. And not once did the republicans try to smear anyone with filthy lies, or throw a psychologically unstable woman under the bus. So what was your point?

      • Mr Sir says:

        ” And not once did the republicans try to smear anyone with filthy lies, or throw a psychologically unstable woman under the bus.”

        No, but they did intentionally let a nomination stay in limbo for over 290 days and took no action on it because they knew it would give the Supreme Court a liberal majority, because Mitch McConnell is an evil, whiny baby.

        • spike55 says:

          Every right to hold back a nomination from an out-going president who should never had made that appointment in the first place.

          Poor whiny, slimy, Mr slur…. fails again

          You are irrelevant even as a far-left apologist troll.

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          It must hurt real bad to get beaten by an evil baby.

          Put some ointment on it, Mr Sir, and locate the nearest safe space. Meanwhile, I will send flowers to Democratic legislative genius Harry Reid. And some ointment, too, I think.

          • Johansen says:

            Was that when he got his ass whipped in a gay bar in Vegas? He shows up in the Senate all banged up, and doesn’t realize how ridiculous it looks on camera. Just that alone makes you question his intelligence

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            I don’t know. I heard somewhere he tried to feel up a masseuse and she disagreed.

        • Rah says:

          No comparison. Those that try to justify the Democrats current all out attempt at the politics of personal destruction with such drivel are sick.

        • Rah says:

          I suspect this despicable episode will be nothing compared to what we’ll see if Trump nominates a replacement for Ginsberg or Breyer.

        • Rah says:

          If Trump nomonees replace both of the libral dinosaurs it will be though to pack the court to change the balance.

        • Gator says:

          No, they withheld the vote because they had the power, and according to Biden more than the right, to do so. Quit projecting your whining upon others. Remember this…

    • tonyheller says:

      Joe Biden laid out the case very clearly in 1992 why lame duck presidents don’t get to make Supreme Court picks. This is long standing tradition and has nothing to do with the filthy behavior of the Democrats.

      • Squidly says:

        And I don’t recall anyone utterly destroying the life of Merrick Garland and lives of his entire family!

        The left are total hypocrites. The Dumbocraps are a part of pure evil. They don’t care about women, they don’t care about minorities. They use these groups to further advance their political agenda .. period .. the Dumbocraps are the party of slavery and the KKK for crying out loud! .. you can’t get much more evil than that! … And I would contend that the Dumbocrap party is even worse now than it was back then. Plenty of evidence to support my assertion.

        By the way, did anyone catch what the director of the ACLU said on Tucker Carlson last Thursday night? …. “this is not a trial, there is no presumption of innocence” … are you freaking kidding me? … this is astonishing! .. and from the ACLU? .. If not for the presumption of innocence, with or without a trial, a society cannot sustain. period. Do we really need to repeat history?

        As has been described by the likes of Michael Meyers (former VP of the ACLU) and Alan Dershowitz … the ACLU is nothing short of a terrorist organization attempting to dismantle our Constitution and our Republic. Michael Meyers (former President of the NAACP) has also stated similar about that organization. There is nothing good about either organization, and they should both be fought against and destroyed.

      • Phil. says:

        Well Obama wasn’t a ‘lame duck’ president when he nominated Merrick Garland. Also even if he were it is not a ‘longstanding tradition’, in fact 6 Supreme Court justices were confirmed after being nominated by ‘lame duck’ presidents. One of those being John Marshall, nominated by John Adams, one of the founding fathers.

    • spike55 says:

      Mr Slur ……… FAILS yet again !!

    • Disillusioned says:

      Little Mr. Sir said: “Me: Does the name “Merrick Garland” ring a bell to you hypocrites?”

      Do you always talk to yourself in the mirror?

  6. David Boyd says:

    BREAKING NEWS (CNN)……Judge Brett Kavanaugh was caught ”Naked” with 3 nurses just moments after his birth !!!!!!

  7. gregole says:

    Ford was an unconvincing liar. Pure balderdash. How she was allowed to testify before congress is evidence of decay in our civilization. The requirement for corroborating witnesses goes back to biblical times; before English common law; before our own legal system. That she was permitted into the halls of congress is a disgrace.

  8. Psalmon says:

    We ALL owe the Democrats a lot. Now millions of young people can aspire to join the profession “creepy porn lawyer.” With a lot of elbow grease, and some for the hair, a whole new profession is born.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.