A Consistent Pattern Of Fraud

All of the claims in this article by the Union of Concerned Scientists Communists are the exact opposite of reality.

Global Warming in the Northeast | Union of Concerned Scientists

Four of the six worst blizzards in New York City history have occurred since 1996. Cherry blossoms are blooming later in Washington DC.


March temperatures in the Northeast peaked around 1920 and again in the 1940s.

Summer temperatures in the Northeast peaked in the 1940s.

The percentage of hot days in the Northeast has plummeted. The last really hot summer they had was 1988, when James Hansen was warning Congress that everyone was going to burn up.

There is no indication that sea level rise has accelerated in the Northeast.

Sea Level Trends – NOAA Tides & Currents

Sea Level Trends – NOAA Tides & Currents

The warmest January in the Northeast occurred in 1790, during George Washington’s first month in office.

A Meteorological Account of the Weather in Philadelphia: From January 1 … – Charles Peirce – Google Books

UCSUSA is attempting top create alarm, without one shred of evidence there is anything to be alarmed about. It is based entirely on lies and fraud.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to A Consistent Pattern Of Fraud

  1. winnipeg boy says:

    my guess is that their buddies that run ‘green’ energy companies are running out of money (see: Solyndra) and will be unable to fund their (concerned scientists) globetrotting boondoggles unless there is a fresh infusion of government cash. They won’t last 2 more years under Pruitt.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      UCSUSA should merge with the larger and better financed Union of Concerned Toddlers.

      • GeologyJim says:

        My, My! The little tykes certainly have advanced penmanship and spelling skills.

        I especially like the little circles over the “i”s and [of course] the exclamation marks!!!!!

        They must go to a “progressive” school

        • arn says:

          I’m also impressed that they write like grown ups,especially handling a huge pen and writing huge letters is usually a 100% mess.

          Another impressive thing is that all the letters tend to shift to the left slightley,though most people write with a tendency to the right-probably because they’d been written by the same lefthanded person.

          But it does not matter anyway.
          You just need a few toddlers,tell them what opinion to have,repeat it 3 * on tv
          and all of a sudden it is the opionion of all people.

      • Gator says:

        Why are they smiling? Maybe because they have no idea what their idiot parents are up to, and how awful their lives will be under a Green New Deal?

        Child abuse. Call the police.

        • Gamecock says:

          “Why are they smiling?”

          Indeed. The irony of the disconnect is overwhelming.

          “It’s the end of the world, and I feel fine.”

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          They are smiling because they know they are the Progrssives’ secret weapon against climate change.

          Education was described by one speaker as one of the most effective “secret weapons” in the fight against climate change. Here are some of the comments that came from presentations and panel discussions:

          -Youth voices must be heard since they will face the consequences of our actions on climate change.

          -Children want quick action and not delays. They often prod their parents into action.

          -Teach children to be good stewards in their daily lives.

          -Combine the head (knowledge) and the heart (actions).

          -Focus on education for global citizenship, not just local actions.

          -Focusing on current disasters may spark interest, but often there are not long term benefits.

          -Turn the first connected-generation into the first climate-aware generation… through the use of technologies, including social media, gamification and video; Include intercultural learning and relevant content.


          • Gator says:

            Prohibition was also a Progressive ideal, and they accomplished it using schoolchildren and women. Their “success” lasted for 15 years, helped to cripple the economy, and financed the rise of organized crime.

            The grin of useful idiots, I suppose.

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            Progressivism is the theory that children know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.

            h/t H.L. Mencken

  2. Denis Rushworth says:

    Your sea level trend charts for Battery Park and Atlantic City neglect to consider land settlement. Both sites are equipped with GPS elevation sensors which show that both have been settling for the past decade or more; about -1.62mm/yr in AC and about -2.12 mm/yr at Battery Park. Assuming the GPS measurements are representative of long term settlement, the actual sea level rise at both sites is about 0.7 mm/yr with no indication whatever of acceleration.

  3. Dave O. says:

    The non-acceleration of sea level rise shows that whatever warming is occurring, it is predominately natural.

    • Disillusioned says:

      I’m sorry, but that is nonsense. Your simplistic summation is fodder for the alarmist, which they can use for their goal of global control. Because, basically what you’re saying is that non-acceleration in sea level rise is normal – AND – when acceleration of sea level rise occurs next, then it must be caused by humans. That is utter bullshit.

      Both acceleration and deceleration in sea level rise has occured time and again, over and over, over the millennia, before and without any help of humans and their technologies.

      • David A says:

        True, yet if we were getting the claimed rapid GLOBAL warming,
        then SL rise would be accelerating.
        Tis evidence that the manipulated surface record is FUBAR.

        • Disillusioned says:

          Bingo. The last fast acceleration in sea level rise was at the start of the Roman Climatic Optimum ~2,000 years ago. Alarmists have never explained the rapid rises and drops in sea level of the recent past, when CO2 levels were supposedly balanced and perfect – long before the Industrial Revolution ever began.

          Without empirical data, they do a remarkable job convincing goldfish that the red dots on the far right are indicative of a man-made warming problem.

          Image – h/t John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia

  4. feathers says:

    Tony – I’ve read that the NSC is forming a “Red Cell” to combat climate alarmism. Hopefully you are on board? Also, what are your views on the newly confirmed EPA Administrator – Andrew Wheeler?

  5. Anon says:

    Here is a little background on the Union of Concerned Scientists and Climate Change, from Richard Lindzen:

    Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?
    Richard S. Lindzen Program in Atmospheres, Oceans and Climate MIT

    It is, of course, possible to corrupt science without specifically corrupting institutions. For example, the environmental movement often cloaks its propaganda in scientific garb without the aid of any existing scientific body. One technique is simply to give a name to an environmental advocacy group that will suggest to the public that the group is a scientific rather than an environmental group. Two obvious examples are the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Woods Hole Research Center10,11. The former conducted an intensive advertising campaign about ten years ago in which they urged people to look to them for authoritative information on global warming. This campaign did not get very far – if only because the Union of Concerned Scientists had little or no scientific expertise in climate.


  6. Mac says:

    There is no conceivable way that any honest and intelligent person could come to the conclusion that the whole climate change thing is nothing more than a thoroughly corrupt and malicious scam. The information I’ve been exposed to by this blog over the last several years seems to be, to me, inarguable. However, it doesn’t stop the devout and robotic climate faithful from coming here to the comments section and saying the same things over and over when confronted with real data. My favorite objections are “cherry picking” (which means any genuine data that refutes their lies and exposes their actual real cherry picking and fabrications), “straw man” (which means the argument is completely valid, sound, and irrefutable), and the old “that didn’t happen” (such as when illustrating very nicely how the 1970s was chock full of hundreds and hundreds of articles and reports everywhere about how the world was headed for a new ice age because of, of course, human activity.

    Please keep up the good work, Mr. Heller, and I look forward to your continued perseverance in the face of what must be a sometimes tiring undertaking, since you’re dealing with an opposition composed entirely of lunatics, liars, and truly ignorant churlish dolts.

  7. Lasse says:

    Acceleration is change in speed!
    As can be seen in this diagram.
    As we could have seen also during the 1920s.

    • David A says:

      chart appears to end 20 plus years ago.
      Tide guages adjusted for land movement show 1.5 mm per year SLR. ZERO speeding up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *