Using Children For Propaganda

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Using Children For Propaganda

  1. PTM says:

    Pretty much everything about the climate alarmist movement is a fraud, including the Swedish girl shown, Greta Thunberg. I showed her photo to my teenage daughter and asked my daughter how old Greta was. My daughter said that Greta was 11 or 12 years old. But, Greta is 16 years old! My daughter could not believe it when I told her. Greta has deliberately dressed and worn her hair to fraudulently portray her age. You can guess why. It just says a lot about who these people are.

  2. Cornelius says:

    Most of our adults don’t have the ability to think critically. How about getting the next generation off to a better start, and teach them about it? No better subject than the one at hand.

  3. Jimmy Haigh says:

    The same is true for every religion: Leave the kids alone.

  4. rah says:

    Great truths sometimes come out of the mouths of babes.

  5. Johansen says:

    Sheesh, there isn’t even a viable *mechanism* for CO2-induced warming. The atmosphere is almost totally opaque to long wave radiation in the CO2-connected range. Translation: it became saturated w/r/t CO2 a long time ago. And OSHA doesn’t even care about full-day exposure to CO2 until 10,000 ppm.

    • Robert Austin says:

      The atmosphere in the lower troposphere is opaque to CO2 radiative wavelengths but not in the upper troposphere at approximately 1/10 bar. At this elevation, CO2 can radiate some portion of absorbed energy to space. So there is some minuscule “greenhouse” effect due to to CO2. The question is whether the effect is enough to be measurable. Certainly there is no H2O based amplification or we would observe the predicted hot spot.

      • Johansen says:

        Thanks for your feedback. I’m not saying there isn’t downwelling due to CO2… I’m just saying it’s already basically reached its maximum at the current level of 400+ ppm. Of course the CO2 at top of atmosphere is going to radiate to space; there has to be equilibrium. Am I understanding you correctly?

        • Robert Austin says:

          I think so. I think it plays into the hands of the alarmist crowd when one makes the simplistic statement that the atmosphere is opaque to CO2 radiative wavelengths implying that an increase in CO2 in the atmosphere has zero effect when an increase should have a theoretical minuscule effect. If the alarmist scientists hadn’t invented the strong water feedback effect and bungled (perhaps deliberately) the effects of cloud and aerosols, we would not be having this discussion and the multi-billion dollar climate industry could work on real problems.

  6. John F. Hultquist says:

    Brian still believes spicy foods cause stomach ulcers.

  7. arn says:

    Climate Science is not reality.

    Neither the 97% nonsens is real(which in fact is just a cherry picked 52% consens)
    nor do their predictions predict reality but are generally 100% failures.
    Be it polar bears & arctic ice to go extinct,
    lower manhattan and maledives to drown
    or all the record melts all around the world which are simply lies
    as the sea level rise of the last 30 years was the same 3mm a year
    as it was the 70 years before that.

    Climate Science is so far away from reality that they even recycle the unreal apocalyptical fantasies of the ice age scare of the 70’s
    and now they even pretend that the ice age scare never existed
    which was as real as AGW is now.

    • R Shearer says:

      It depends on definitions. It is an industry now and lots of people are making money off of it and using it as a tool for political power. Climate science is real as far as money and power are concerned.

      • arn says:

        In political and power grabbing proganda terms it is real.
        But as it is called climate SCIENCE and not climate politics or climate propaganda it is unreal as science can be.

        But they are doing their best to make it look real.
        (in fact for most mainstream believers AGA appears as
        most real science,considering that it gets 10* more coverage than all other science combined)
        Indroctinating and uniting people,especially children with fear
        (if you do not think what we think
        you are no longer part of our group but a racist,bigot,nazi)

  8. richard says:

    I believe another bumper year for agriculture this year.

    As it is every year- some climate change we are having.

  9. Tom says:

    There is an item in psychology called “The Primacy Effect”. This consists of the fact that what you first learn you will spend the rest of your life believing to be true unless you make a concerted attempt to use logic and science to verify it. Unfortunately few people are willing or able to use the logic necessary to really investigate the false science of climate change and as long as the false environmentalists control the schools this can only grow in the common citizen. What it will take is for our President or anyone else of equal power to cause serious legislation making it criminal to teach these false sciences. Exactly HOW that might be done I couldn’t say. But unless people like Dr. Michael Mann are facing more than financial loses for inventing data this will continue.

  10. Eben says:

    The kid girl is well dressed to fight the global heat

  11. Caleb Shaw says:

    The cynical socialists who know Global Warming is a scam but still cause small children to have nightmares are cruising for a bruising, spiritually (which is likely why they tend to veer towards atheism.)

    Jesus stated, “It would be better for them to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.”

    I am most saddened by the ignorant young teachers brought up to accept such propaganda, who teach from a textbook holding the scam as “settled science”. They think they are pleasing “Big Brother”, but are in fact useful idiots. Mao had nearly all teachers “purged” in the Cultural Revolution, and Pol Pot had people executed for even being able to write. In Venezuela teachers were promised a fat pension, but the money is worthless now.

    Children should be taught to think critically. Fortunately they are not as gullible as some believe. From the start they appreciate a good trick and sleight-of-hand, and recognize ignorance because ignorance has a habit of burning you, and then, “Once burnt, twice shy.”

    In the end Truth will triumph simply because it doesn’t have to work hard to be true.

    • Johansen says:

      …”ignorant young teachers”…
      “Malicious” might be a better word. My daughter is taking a New Testament History class at a well-known college because she needs the Humanities credits. That **could be** an incredibly fascinating topic – some very important things were happening in the Judaean Province of the Roman Empire from Augustus to roughly Vespasian, and yet all the venerable Professor does is badmouth “The Church”, attack Western Civilization, tell worthless stories about his private life, and on and on.
      About half the students have already transferred out of the class. Pretty much a complete waste….

  12. Tom Abbott says:

    Brian says on twitter: “That’s projection. Climate SCIENCE is reality. We are talking about teaching kids the truth, and not lies.”

    Tony Heller is talking about teaching the truth, too.

    Brian seems to think his side has a monopoly on truth. This is a sign of a True Believer, one who rejects all challenges to his beliefs as lies. A rigid mind with a narrow focus. Brian is not alone. There are millions of Brians out there.

    Brian only wants to give the kids one side of the story, his side. He wants the other side to shut up and not challenge his belief system.

    Kids, it ought to tell you something when proponents of an idea such as human-caused climate change won’t defend their ideas with facts and evidence, but instead try to shut up those who don’t agree with their idea.

    If the proponents of a idea were sure of themselves and their idea, then they would be eager to debate and talk about their idea anytime and anywhere. But they don’t do that. Instead, they hide behind character assasination of those who challenge them because they have no cogent argument to make.

    A word to the wise is sufficient.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.