Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- dennisambler on New Video : Protecting Children From Climate Fraud
- rah on Obama’s Plan Vs Trump’s Plan
- John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia on New Video : Demonizing Our Cleanest Energy
- Janet Marshall on New Video : Protecting Children From Climate Fraud
- Aussie on Rewriting America’s History
Archives
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
New Video : Rewriting History, One State At A Time
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Nice research and well-delivered…again.
The hits just keep coming!!
Great one, Tony! Thanks!
This reminds me the same discrepancy of about 2°C between the official Meteo France weather station and the StatIC weather station in Gallargues-le-Montueux this summer :
– the Meteo France weather station is located outside the city, is surrounded by vegetation, near a water canal and measured a max temperature of 45.9°C,
– about 2°C more than the StatIC network weather station which is located inside Gallargues, on a roof, above a wall on which there is an AC, on a house overlooking on two streets (asphalt and stones).
I can find the google views of the two weather stations if of interest.
Just for fun, I looked up the highest temperature ever recorded in Michigan, where I live. The record of 112 degrees Fahrenheit was set in the little village of Stanwood, which I had to look up. That’s really hot! I wonder if there were any other indications of high temperatures in the state when this record was set?
Just look at the images of actual newspapers in Detroit (about 250 miles away to the east) for that period; I’ll give you the gist of the story in this quote:
“On this day, July 14, 1936, Detroit endured the last day of what ended up being its deadliest heat wave ever”
Here’s the headline for the day of the record, July 14, 1936, in the Detroit Free Press:
“Detroit Heat Toll Mounts To 186 Dead; state fatalities pass 400 on sixth 100 degree day.”
https://www.clickondetroit.com/weather/2017/07/14/on-this-day-in-1936-detroits-deadliest-heat-wave-finally-ends/
Just watched Dan Britt: Orbits & Ice Ages-The History of Climate. He makes a compelling argument but in the end is not really sure if higher CO2 levels are really that bad other than the possibility of rising sea levels. Would be interested in your take on his presentation.
Hi Tony
I see your mate Zeke Hausfather has just published a paper proving that 14 of 17 climate models were remarkably accurate in predicting climate change for the last 50 years. Were there really only 17 climate models produced in this time?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/04/climate-models-have-accurately-predicted-global-heating-study-finds
Anyway the MSM are all over it like a rash.
Would be good to hear your views on this Tony
Simon
Ask Zeke what his UHI adjustment is, and then chuckle.
Simon,
The article is pure propaganda. Taking upward-adjusted temperatures and then claiming success with a cherry-picked handful is criminal.
17 models is a blatant cherry-pick. There are many climate models.
https://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/95-of-climate-models-agree-the-observations-must-be-wrong/
OBTW, the article mentions Hansen. His model failure is epic.
Tony, once again, great work.
Here is a big article in today’s NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/climate/climate-change-acceleration.html
I know that there are far too many articles coming out each day for you to prove wrong, but maybe focusing on the national ones such as the one noted above might have a bigger impact for you…?
In any event, there is too much work to be done here for one person…maybe you can join up with Heartland or NIPCC or something of the like, that may have more resources so your work can be expanded?
Thank you for all you do and to your intelligent readers who add good stuff too.
Notice they do not mention all the record cold, and that they point to both droughts and floods as proof of something.
Idiots believe that our climate is supposed to be benign, and never change. I do not waste my time listening to idiots.
Hi Tony, your posts inform my own skepticism about the “crisis”. However i watched Dan Britt, Uni of Central Florida, who presented a fairly plausible explanation in his History of Climate lecture on YouTube. His graph at the 30 -35 min point seems curiously at odds with your ideas.
Can you direct me to any of your YouTube presentations that could clarify the differences?
Regards Rod
Tony, just saw your video on YouTube. I went to Google Maps and looked at the aerial imagery. I found a fenced compound near a building with parking areas similar to the view you show that appears to be using Google Earth. There was a point label nearby indicating US Core of Engineers, so I’m guessing that’s who runs the building and temperature sensor.
Unfortunately there were no street views at that location. I tried searching to find what type of instrument the USCE uses, but had no luck finding anything. What may be important is whether the temperature sensor was motor aspirated or wind aspirated. Most cheaper temperature sensors have shielding from the sun, but are wind aspirated. Wind aspiration works fine when there is wind, but usually when temperatures are extremely high winds are light and this can lead to a high bias in wind aspirated sensors compared to motor aspirated sensors. I have seen as much as 5F to 8F too high at wind aspirated sensors in El Paso with light winds and hot temperatures as compared to nearby motor aspirated sensors. This pattern is consistent every time there are light winds in conjunction with high temperatures. Many meteorologists are not familiar with this issue and thus it may not have been considered when validating the record measurement.