Fauci Lied And People Died

How many of the 150,000 deaths could have been prevented had Fauci been honest about HCQ?

Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 — nobody needed to die

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to Fauci Lied And People Died

  1. Don B says:

    “It is unclear when Dr. Fauci came to believe the opposite of what the NIH published when he was the NIH Director. What we do know is that 70,000-100,000 excess American lives have been lost due to lack of access to HCQ. So why did a medication that had been over the counter for decades, suddenly but quietly get pulled from the shelves, in the midst of a pandemic, due to a virus that is so similar it shares a name?

    “It is well known that newly patented drugs can be extremely profitable if there is demand and no other supply. The demand for Gilead’s Remdisivir, which is used late in the disease, obviously will plummet if the disease is stopped by HCQ early. Remdisivir is sold for $3200-$5700 per treatment and the federal government has already purchased all or most of it. The generic HCQ is ~$10 per treatment.”

    https://www.hospicepatients.org/white-paper-on-hcq-from-americasfrontlinedoctors-com-2020.2.pdf

  2. Steve Case says:

    Off Topic:

    After graduate school de Blasio served as a social relief volunteer in Nicaragua—a country then torn by a civil war between the Marxist government of the Sandinistas and counterrevolutionary forces—and returned to the United States a committed socialist.

    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Bill-de-Blasio

  3. Steve Case says:

    More Off Topic:

    There is no difference between communism & socialism, except in the means of
    achieving the same ultimate end: Communism proposes to enslave men by force,
    socialism – by vote. It is merely the Difference between murder & suicide. Ayn Rand

  4. just a thought says:

    THEY KNOW HCQ WORKS!

    Yes, I see Tony posted this, but I think it bears emphasizing.
    “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread”
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

    See also here.
    https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_did_Fauci_not_recommend_Chloroquine_as_a_treatment_for_Covid19

    You don’t give half your subjects a placebo when you know many more WILL die because they didn’t get the effective drug. That’s not just unethical, it’s evil. (Dr. Mengele seen nodding in approval of Fauci’s lies.)

  5. Outcomes of 3,737 COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine/ azithromycin and other regimens in Marseille, France: A retrospective analysis
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302817

    Clinical Efficacy of Chloroquine derivatives in COVID-19 Infection: Comparative meta-analysis between the Big data and the real world
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297520300615

    Treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and combination in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
    https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1201971220305348

  6. czechlist says:

    Fauxi is a career swamp creature. He is an acknowledged Hillary voter.
    Isn’t he a vaccinologist? His raison d’ etre is prevention, not treatment. Where are his vaccinations for AIDS and the common cold? Why are the front line doctors who are actually treating the victims not allowed to be heard? When my car breaks down I trust my mechanic to diagnose and fix it, not a failure analysis lab to decide how to prevent a reoccurence.

  7. Gerald Machnee says:

    Has anyone seen Dr. Gupta, the CNN prop say anything good about HCQ?
    If he did he would be gone from CNN.

  8. GeologyJim says:

    Uh oh! Looks like Dr “Grouchy” Fauci has got some serious ‘splainin’ to do

  9. tom0mason says:

    From https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/4755

    From: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAID) [E] [mailto:AFAUCI@niaid.nih.gov]
    Saturday, June 02, 2012 05:28 PM
    Sent:
    To: Mills, Cheryl D; Quam, Lois E
    Subject: Remarks of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton At “A World in Transition: Charting a New Path in Global Health”

    Cheryl/Lois: Wow! Very rarely does a speech bring me to tears, but this one did it. Talk about telling it like it is. This was a bases-loaded home run. Please tell the Secretary that I love her more than ever you guys too, of course.
    Best regards, Tony

    Anthony S. Fauci,
    MD Director National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
    Building 31,
    Room 7A-03 31 Center Drive,
    MSC 2520 National Institutes of Health Bethesda,
    MD 20892-2520
    Phone: (301) 496-2263 FAX: (301) 496-4409 E-mail: afauci

    So Anthony S. Fauci, as MD Director National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was a fan of Hilary R. Clinton and her ideas of a national health service!
    — Interesting.

  10. Disillusioned says:

    Damning.

  11. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Wikileaks exposed Fauci as an adoring Hillary supporter, and CDC employees donate to the Democrats over Republicans at a ratio of 1,600:1.

    Very hard for them to overcome their personal politics and look at HCQ with an unbiased view. Which unfortunately has cost lives. Lots of lives.

    That is the wages of the Gramscian long march through the institutions.

  12. Mark A Luhman says:

    IfHCQ works Fauci stands to lose millions. Now can you guess what side he on? If you can’t you are truly and idiot.

  13. Colin says:

    And yet several trials have clearly indicated that hcq with or without azithromycin has no effect it or slightly worse effect.

    • feathers says:

      Its all about reducing viral load. If you administer HCQ 24-36 hours after symptoms, its too late. However, I am very confident in its role as a “pre-exposure” prophylaxis.

    • An Inquirer says:

      I know of no TRIALS where HCQ has shown to have no effect (or slightly worse) where COVID-19 was diagnosed. I know of a few STUDIES where that was the supposed conclusion after examining (after the fact) the treatment that various patients received. But in everyone of those studies there was little effort to have a legitimate control group vs. the treatment group. In every study that I have read — after a little digging — I found that the treatment group was older, more male, more obese, and farther along in the disease than the control group. As we say in statistics, that was a study designed to fail. Those who quote such studies reveal either their ignorance of statistics or a willingness to misrepresent the facts & deceive the audience.
      In addition, there was one study where there was a decent foundation for the control group vs the treatment group, but the study did NOT test for the presence of COVID19, but rather asked the subjects if they thought that they had contracted it. In that trial, there was a 20% reduction in COVID infection for those taking HCQ, but that reduction was not statistically significant.

  14. Colin says:

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2019014
    Here’s one latest trial that shows no improvement using hcq and az

    • Walter L. Wagner says:

      the doctors waited way too late. the patients were on oxygen supplement already. disease had progressed quite far. HCQ works best if given with Zn, and EARLY (prophylaxis or at earliest onset of symptoms), not after in the hospital for days on end. people who have been researching this are well aware of this fact, and how others use studies such as the one you cite to discredit valid research that is properly done.

      Tony cited a white-paper; you should read through the extensive references and you’ll see numerous studies supporting HCQ when used properly (early, and best with zinc): https://www.hospicepatients.org/white-paper-on-hcq-from-americasfrontlinedoctors-com-2020.2.pdf

      also see the lawsuit against the FDA that cites good references: https://aapsonline.org/judicial/aaps-v-fda-hcq-6-22-2020.pdf

    • Ohio Cyclist says:

      I think you will find that those studies designed to discredit use of hcq are fatally flawed and some have actually been retracted.

      Among the flaws are omitting any zinc supplementation, administering too high a dose of hcq, starting treatment too late, and having the hcq group being sicker than the non-hcq group.

      It is like taking a tool and misusing it, and then claiming that this shows that the tool does not work and is in-effective.

    • Gator says:

      Large French Real-World Observational Study Reveals Hydroxychloroquine & Azithromycin Associated with Reduction in Hospitalization & Death for COVID-19 Patients

      https://www.trialsitenews.com/large-french-real-world-observational-study-reveals-hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin-associated-with-reduction-in-hospitalization-death-for-covid-19-patients/

      Hate filled activists posing as scientists are purposefully tanking HCQ studies, but when applied properly HCQ has proved it can save tens of thousands of lives.

      All you need to know about the left is that they are willing to sacrifice untold millions of innocent lives to gain a political advantage.

    • An Inquirer says:

      Read the paper thoroughly. You will find that the control group and the treatment group were not ceteris paribus save the treatment. The treatment used HCQ as a heroic last ditch effort. Therefore the study neither treated the groups equally, nor did the study adminster HCQ is a manner advocated by its supporters. Ratehr, it appears to be a study designed to fail.

  15. feathers says:

    This is my area of expertise. HCQ almost certainly inhibits SARS-CoV-2 as a pre-exposure prophylaxis or during the very early stages of infection (prodrome phase). I say this with high confidence because HCQ has not one but at least three antiviral mechanisms. (1) and the one most known about is that it alkalizes endosomal pH which inhibits CoV growth; (2) it binds to sialic acid receptors which essentially ‘crowds out’ SARS-CoV-2 from binding to ACE2 receptors; and (3) HCQ helps zinc penetrate the cell membrane (which it cannot do alone). Zinc is a known CoV inhibitor (even the great Dr. Baric wrote about this in 2010). Of course HCQ works. It’s safe and on the WHO list of essential medicines. 100% of these so called ‘journalists’ would not hesitate to take a months-worth supply prior to an exotic safari trip to Botswana.

  16. Susan Ball says:

    So the paper referred to above is about the effects in vitro, in a cell culture in a lab. It is obviously important and should have led to further research and greater exposure, but its not exactly what it is being promoted as.
    What is more worrying is the paper published here, in Nat Med. 2015 December ; 21(12): 1508–1513. doi:10.1038/nm.3985. SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus pose threat for human emergence. In which it states, in the abstract, “we generated..”and continues “vaccine approaches failed..” Read on. Check out the list of authors.

  17. Susan Ball says:

    Also, forgive the multiple posts, but Simone Gold apparently has now been fired.

  18. Something strange happened when Trump was elected. The media and the deep state went into a cytokline storm and sabatoged the entire Trump presidency. Along with many events, the fact that all discussion of the HCQ therapy has been so vigorously crushed is odd. When you have legitimate scientists who claim that they have used it successfully then you need to open the door on future experimentation, not slam it shut. The arguments about how dangerous it is don’t match with the approved and everyday use of HCQ for several diseases. If this is going to get a fair review, the doctors who are using it are going to have to network with other doctors and get more of them using it. Also what are the other countires doing? Can doctor in France be called upon to provide evidence from his efforts? If HCQ is useful , then it is too big to allow them to keep it from us. We need to bypass through the media monolith and get this into the open.

    • Walter L. Wagner says:

      Dr. Simone Gold has another take on that. She noted that HCQ was withdrawn as an OTC drug in early January, 2020 in France, after decades of safe usage. This was a few weeks after China started reporting success with its usage. She suspects that they were clearing the way for pharmaceutical companies to try new drugs, which is where the money is. This was 2 weeks before Trump blocked travel from China to the U.S. and well before he started talking about it.

      I suspect it’s a combination of both – clearing a path for pharmaceutical companies to capitalize on this, and in the U.S., for the leftists to go after Trump.

  19. Susan Ball says:

    So the paper referred to above is about the effects in vitro, in a cell culture in a lab. It is obviously important and should have led to further research and greater exposure, but its not exactly what it is being promoted as.
    What is more worrying is the paper published here, Nat Med. 2015 December ; 21(12): 1508–1513. doi:10.1038/nm.3985. SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus pose threat for human emergence. In which it states, in the abstract, “we generated..”and continues “vaccine approaches failed”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *