Fifty Seven Years

Fifty-seven years of the deep state taking presidents down, and making fake commissions to cover it up.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

34 Responses to Fifty Seven Years

  1. Steve Case says:

    Thanks Tony, in all of my meanderings on the net yesterday, I’m sure there were others, but your page is the only one I saw making note of the Kennedy assassination.

  2. arn says:

    Kennedy was shot because of EO 11110
    which was a direct attack on the CiA and FED = deep state.

    LBJ cancelled EO 11110,started the Vietnam War based on a lie(Tonkin Incident never happened)
    and after the main (drug)experiments of MK Ultra/Project Bluebird were finished and curtailed in 1964 the CiA(&Meyer Lansky) started in 1965 to systematically smuggle drugs via Air America etc. to the USA to supply the hippie movement from the start with hard stuff and “redistribute” the money of LBJ welfare program back.

    As result a CiA Boss whose parents financed Hitler(UBS Bank,Harriman-Bush Hitler project)
    became US president(and announced the New World Order several times) and got exposed for drug&weapon smuggling(iran-contra)
    as he was not getting rid of whitnesses and opponents in the same systematic way his presidential successor did in arkansas(arcancide).
    Later another US president got caught delivering military weapons to favouref mexican drug cartells(fast&furious scandal) to help them protect the drug monopol.
    As result drug related killings skyrocketed in mexico.
    (and those very same country destroying genocidal politicians are so “worried” about human lives that they want to protect them with lockdowns :)

    • Ginny Silcox says:

      This is a pretty good summary of events leading up to 911. Unfortunately, things didn’t stop where you ran out of room. I’m currently in the process of researching how exposure to EMFs changes cell permeability…we are being completely altered by so much exposure. It opens us up to pathogens and destroys brain cells…so the genocide continues.

    • Disillusioned says:

      I believe that’s the same future U.S. President who could not recall exactly where he was when JFK was assassinated.

  3. An Inquirer says:

    There may be unusual circumstances surrounding JFK’s assassination, but that is a long ways away from conclusive proof that the deep state killed him. Unfortunately, this type of allegations undermines the good work that you do elsewhere.

    • Linda says:

      I’m sure Tony’s single post is not offered as conclusive proof, but it might help to open a few minds. We need all the open minds we can get in this world!

    • Jay Michaels says:

      I’m not sure you have done enough research. Deep enough to get key elements of the secret service to make it happen. See video of agent being waved off Kennedy’s car by head SS agent prior to heading into the plaza. The agent is totally confused by the order.

  4. Larry Webster says:

    And now John Kerry is special envoy on Climate. What a joke!

  5. Leonard Harris says:

    Like many of my generation I remember with total clarity where I was when I heard that President Kennedy had been shot and killed. I was 17 years old and with my mother in a supermarket ( very new thing back then ) in south London. Suddenly the manager came onto the loudspeaker system, ( which had been playing music ) to say in a very grave and solumn voice.
    “Here is a newsflash. President Kennedy has been shot”
    He paused for a moment before adding the word “dead”.
    There was a moment of total silence as everyone took in what they had just heard.
    Suddenly everyone started talking, nearly all just abandoned their shopping baskets, and there was a great rush as everyone headed out of the store to run home to hear more on the TV news broadcasts. Within a few seconds the store was almost completely empty. My mother and I got back to our home within ten minutes to be greeted by my father with the same stunning news. My parents who had both survived World War II were hugely concerned that we might be on the verge of another World War.

  6. Jeff says:

    James Files shot and killed JFK.

    • arn says:

      The movie “Executive Action(1973)” (about the JFK killing)
      has the most “prophetic” film quotes ever
      (besides the long monologue of the devil in the movie bedazzled(1967))

      “In a few decades there will be more than 7 billion people on earth.
      And many of them will then try to enter europe and north america.
      If we use the right methods we should succeed to get the population below 550 mio by the end of the (21st) century.”

      Movie was made 10 years before the georgia guidestones existed.

  7. sdr says:

    Everyone seems to forget what Ike said next about academia!

    • Loco Hombre says:

      They forgot the WHOLE Speech!
      Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961
      ​ Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040

      My fellow Americans:
      Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.
      This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.
      Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.
      Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.
      My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.
      In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.
      We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America’s leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.
      Throughout America’s adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.
      Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology — global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle — with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.
      Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research — these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.
      But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs — balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage — balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.
      The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.
      A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
      Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
      Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
      This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
      In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
      We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
      Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
      In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
      Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
      The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
      Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
      It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system — ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.
      Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society’s future, we — you and I, and our government — must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.
      Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.
      Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.
      Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war — as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years — I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.
      Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.
      So — in this my last good night to you as your President — I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.
      You and I — my fellow citizens — need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation’s great goals.
      To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America’s prayerful and continuing aspiration:
      We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

  8. Dirk Mullikin says:

    I was ten when this happened and I remember it as if it was yesterday.

  9. David says:

    Only the well behaved will be penalized

  10. Tony, I was going to write to you separately yesterday but this is a convenient forum for me to air my sentiments.

    You are a phenomenal data-hound. I greatly admire your work in many areas. Your contribution always enriches the debate.

    Here’s a suggestion for you. Dr Shiva Ayyadurai is somewhat in the same mould as yourself. I think you and he would get along famously. He has done some work analysing “signals” that allow one to identify areas in an election where fraud is likely to have happened. He uses techniques similar to what I was taught when studying a discipline called “Operations Research” and which I have found to be invaluable both in the military and private enterprise. I really recommend you contact him and see if you can strike up some form or loose collaboration. He strikes me as a decent person and very intelligent person, as are you.

    One of the things that he showed me, regarding the recent Presidential election, excited my interest. He showed how the number of voters who were recorded as voting, in many voting precincts, was less than the number of votes that were recorded as having been cast. The only possibility for this to happen is ballot stuffing.

    Given your prodigious ability to gain access to and analyse data, would it be possible for you to perform an analysis, if possible, across all Counties in the USA?

    I know that is most probably a big request but you have to admit it would be a very interesting project. I would not be surprised, having seen what is, arguably, only a small amount of data, if you found that, across the whole of the USA, hundreds of thousands (if not more than a million) of extra votes were recorded.

    It would also be a very interesting investigation to take all of the details from the lists of people that have voted and cross check them, firstly to find if they had voted more than once, secondly to find out if they exist on other rolls or legal lists, like council rates, in other places, and lastly if they are dead.

    This is a job that is simply crying out for your expertise. Hope you can do something because that which has occurred, looks very, very bad for democracy; not only for the USA but for the free world.

    • Jeff L. says:

      Ayyadurai is a mystery to me. He’s obviously intelligent, but he insists that he’s the “inventor” of email (not *A* inventor of *ONE* email, but *THE* inventor of *ALL* email). For me, this makes his values and judgement questionable. He has invested (or wasted) a large sum of money trying to silence people who have spoken out about his silly claim.

  11. Jim D says:

    Show the photo of CIA scumball GHWBush in front of School Book Depostory minutes after slaying of President Kennedy.
    He is looking in opposite direction of police.
    The whole progression of Deep State Puppets followed.
    LBJ ,one term for callingvoff Secret Service.
    Nixon for perpetuating war in Vietnam.
    Ford for seating influence as only member of Congress on Warren Commission.
    Carter got in the way, so Bush’s CIA destroyed his presidency by staging hostage taking b4 holidays in 1979.
    Reagan beats Bush even though John Hinckley Sr was Bush’s biggest campaign donor in Texas primary in 1980.
    Seventy days into Reagan’s term he is shot by Bush friends son, hmmmm.
    Bush finally gets in and mentions New World Order dozens of times in speeches.
    1992, Mina Airport drug smuggler Clinton gets in and destroys FCC allowing major media corporations own our media sources through Operation Mockingbird.
    Young drunken dummies Bush elected with Evil Halliburton Cheney running show. We get 9/11 CIA/ Mossad getting us in to endless wars as dual purpose.
    Then we get the Kenyan, whose father was of Kenyan rationality 3 years b4 Kenya was a country.
    Look up story about Loretta Duddy. Very enlightening.

    We are screwed unless Sidney Powell prevails demonstrating Dominion voting machine manipulation.

  12. JFT Sutcliffe says:

    Yes, single deflection shot from a WW2 rifle at a moving target. Of course quoted to people that know little about shooting.

    • arn says:

      It was not just an ordinary rifle,
      but most probably the worst ever produced in WW2.
      So bad that the italians called it something like “the gun that never hits a target on purpose”.
      If i remember it right the quality was so bad the production of the gun was stopped during ww2.
      Who stops producing guns during a war?
      Another thing is that it is impossible to shoot,reload and aim
      as fast “Oswald”(the guy who went to cinema after shooting a president intead of heading to mexico) did during the assassination.

    • Gamecock says:

      “Yes, single deflection shot”

      There were 3 shots.

      At 75 yards, not much deflection.

      “from a WW2 rifle”

      What’s that supposed to mean?

      “at a moving target”

      They were driving down the street. A “moving target,” yes. But not a speeding target.

      “Of course quoted to people that know little about shooting.”

      I know plenty. I know that shots from 55 to 75 yards with a rifle are stupid easy.

      There are plenty of things to question about the assassination, but yours is ignorant. The ironing being that you accuse US of ignorance.

      • Mark A Luhman says:

        Excuse me, Castro was not able to duplicate the feat even though he simulated several times. I assume you don’t know this. Add in the magic bullet. Yep only simpleton think otherwise. At 75 yards there is a lot of space, more than one whitetail got away from me even though some did not at 185 and three hundred.

    • arn says:

      “If i could not succeed to shoot Kennedy with special equipment,Oswald could not”

      The conclusion of Craig Roberts,Top Marine Sniper in Vietnam
      after he visited Dealey Plaza and the place where a guy(oswald) who didn’t even succeed to qualify for rifle range in Boot Camp and barely succeeded to qualify for the lowest degree(marksman)later
      did some impossible things that day.

      The best long range shooter in US history(Carlos Hancock)
      always failed to replicate Oswalds miracle when using an identical gun.

      • Gamecock says:

        “The best long range shooter in US history(Carlos Hancock)
        always failed to replicate Oswalds miracle when using an identical gun.”

        Argumentum ad vericundiam fallacy.

        • Anthony Rose says:

          It’s not an argument appealing to authority.
          It’s a description of the results of an experiment.

          • Gamecock says:

            “It’s not an argument appealing to authority.”

            It’s an appeal to an authority in another field. “The best long range shooter in US history.” This was a chip shot. Long range skill not relevant.

  13. richard c merrill says:

    Now we get Kerry as climate czar. He thinks co2 exiists as a 1/2 inch layer above the stratosphere? Sounds like a real climate “scientist”

    • Disillusioned says:

      He thinks co2 exiists as a 1/2 inch layer above the stratosphere?

      Yet CO2 is heavier than ambient air and falls/stays near to the ground. Where plant life can use it. And – radiosonde measurements found no “hot spot” up there. (For some reason, the grantologists don’t like to talk their failed predictions, such as that one).

      CO2 based Climate Change™ is/was the greatest scientific hoax before the Covid19 plandemic… all on the way to the bigger plan, the Great tyranical Reset.

  14. Gummans Gubbe says:

    And in Europa:

    “on November 18, the German parliament passed a law, the so-called “Infection Protection Act” (“Das Infektionsschutzgesetz” in German) formally granting the government the authority to issue whatever edicts it wants under the guise of protecting the public health….This law is not in any way comparable to the “Enabling Act of 1933,” which formally granted the government the authority to issue whatever edicts it wanted under the guise of remedying the distress of the people.

  15. Gamecock says:

    Santo Trafficante, Jr.

    The man behind it.

    “James Files shot and killed JFK.”

    Maybe. There is plenty of evidence that Oswald shot at Kennedy and hit him. But there could have been more, such as Files.

    The Mob was thoroughly pissed at Kennedy for failing to reopen Cuba, and for his little brother Bobby prosecuting the Mob after they had conspicuously supported John. They felt they had been double crossed.

  16. dearieme says:

    Oswald shooting Kennedy isn’t hard to believe. It’s Oswald being murdered that makes the government story hard to believe.

    • Gamecock says:

      Especially because Ruby was an associate of Trafficante’s. It’s self evident the mob didn’t trust Oswald to keep his mouth shut. They surely planned to kill him, but he got himself nabbed by the cops.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *