Featuring leading climate clowns Katharine Hayhoe and Michael Mann
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
- “We Are From The Government And We Are Here To Help”
- Blinken Not Happy Yet
- Chief Executive Kamala
- “Investigated And Discredited”
- Ice-Free Arctic Warning
- No One Is Above The Law!
- Securing Reproductive Rights
- Endless Summer At The New York Times
- “baseless claim”
- “Scientists Tell Us”
- Assessing Climate Risk
- Thanksgiving Greeting From Dr. Fauci
- Follow Liz To Canada
- Climate Deal Reached
- “Siberia will become the greatest farming country in the world”
- New York To Flee The US For Canada
- 50% EV Sales By 2030
- Ivy League Clown Show
- Biden’s Existential Threat
- Massachusetts Saving The Planet
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Colorless, Odorless CO2
- oeman50 on Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- William on Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Greg in NZ on Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Terry Shipman on Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Gamecock on Colorless, Odorless CO2
- conrad ziefle on Colorless, Odorless CO2
- Gamecock on EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Gamecock on Colorless, Odorless CO2
- Richard E Fritz on EPA Climate Change Arrest
Tony, excuse my pedantry (or love of language) and it may be an American thaang as I see it written everywhere, but ‘renown’ is a noun, meaning the condition of being in/famous, whereas ‘renowned’, the adjective, describes someone possessing ‘renown’.
The 2 people fronting this gabfest are renowned for their infamy and self-importance, they do not possess any ‘renown’ except among their deluded followers and fan club – though whatever that has to do with science or reality is another matter.
Any American-speak folk here who can clear up this minor intrigue?
I wouldn’t describe this comedy double act as ‘renowned’, but in view of Mann’s litigious nature, I will refrain from using a more appropriate epithet.
Greg, what is a “climate communicator”?;-} It is a fortunate coincidence that you revealed your pendantry at this time.
Misspellers of the world UnTie
There is a lot of bad grammar in America. I don’t know about anywhere else. But we love to use adjectives like they are adverbs. We love to use pronoun objects like they are subjects.
I can’t take him serious. (ly)
You are bigger than me. (than I am)
Now that I’m tuned to it, it goes way, way back into the 1940s in literature and film, maybe even earlier.
Probably back to the twenties when the USA foolishly started to change their spellings.
Verbing weirds speech.
Climate alarmist delusion: detached, value-free thinker … advanc[ing] truth and … justice.
Psychological diagnosis: Detached from reality, unscrupulous conniver hiding inconvenient facts and imposing misery on poor colored people around the world.
I normally object to, and avoid using, uncalled-for comparisons and metaphors but I, in anticipation of beginning preparations for tomorrow’s event with visiting in-laws, am in need of a czechle chuckle
Corpulent confidence men – Michael Mann and Michael Moore. Separated at birth?
And just to be tawdry – Hayhoe sounds like a loft of fun.
Forgive my uncivil moment and have a Happy Thanksgiving.
Actually Michael Moore ate Mann before birth (a real Manneater if Mann were a man)
and spat him out a few years ago.
That’s why Moore is so skinny now.
But they still share the same combined worth.
So, does that make moore less a mann?
RU sure from which end mann was ejected? Spat or scat?
Oh, dear. What am I doing? I must begin my penance.
Nah, the house is tidied and the bird is thawed. it is now pivo t?icet (beer thirty)!
It may make him half the Mann Mann used to be.
But can not not make Moore less a man
as he does not know what a man is.
This guy actually said 8 years ago
that people will elect Trump to show the establishment the middle finger
and then told people to vote democrats as they are the party of the small people and against the establishment..
So crazy – he should be the editor of Scientific American.
And it’s scat – of course.
In Germany they have a saying : Opinions are like assholes -everyone has one.
In terms of shitlibs (redundant term)
this saying is incorrect.
They have 2 assholes and no opinion – only MSM propaganda.
Therefore both holes only release poo ( so Manns birthlocation can’t be spat)
Here is another Clownshow from Clownstate in the Clowndiscipline.
Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal.
(though they are the only ones who actually produce their cars)
First they came for Twitter,
then they came for Tesla,
then they came for SpaceX
and they liquidated MSNBC the day he bought it.
Martin Niemöller in 2024,probably
I just wonder how they are going to make that fly in the face of a court action. I’m pretty sure that the principle remains that you cannot make a law to harm any single individual or a group of people based on their bla bla (i.e. not against actual criminality). The idiots here in California can try that, and cost all of us taxpayers tons of money due to their stupidity, but in the end they will be owned by Musk.
They learned nothing from their attempts to punish Trump. Possibly he does need to take them to task, but we don’t want to get into a pissing match, even though we may be justified; we need to get the job done and make America better for Americans so that we can win the next election, too.
Well, in this case I do not think that they harm an individual or a group of people but a corporation.
On the other hand ,iirc, in your country corporation are considered people (from this odd point of view anything goes; men are women etc),
but even in thise case there is no real harm.
It’s more like excluding wealthy people from welfare money as Tesla has the biggest market share in the dysfunctional cars domain .
And even if it is harm it is not unprecedent? in your country.
They actually changed a law in NY iirc,
to suspend the statue of limitation for sexual abuse,
so they can go after Trump for an unproven allegation from 3 decades ago by a batshit crazy chick.
And this law change was limited to just one year –
IMO it can not be more obvious that a single law was made to target and harm a single person.
They even used Rico laws to go against him though these laws are very specific against criminal organisations ,
and not against single persons not related to organized crime (well Trump once was a democrat which is the biggest organized crime gang – but he wasn’t sued for that )
I assume they will regret having done that. One way or another.
‘Andso ,all the governments in the world got together and some of them said,well, we’re alrady at one degree and it’s dangerous for us. And then some of them said,well, you know, we’ve crunched the number, we think three degrees will be OK for us but beyond that is dangerous. And everybody HAD to negotiate to figure out, well, what do we agree on? and they agreed finally on two degrees or one and a half, If we can.”
She blocked me for posting what she said.
Forbes 2019