In 1975 there was an ice age coming – evidenced by 1.8 degrees cooling in 20 years, droughts, floods, animals migrating south, polar ice caps expanding, growing seasons shortening, starvation …
Criminals at NASA have since erased this cooling, and wiped out much of history. A crime against humanity.
Those who deceived the public about reality are now reaping the harvest.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_the_Suns_pulsar_core_induce_homo-chirality_in_the_molecules_of_life_and_climate_change_in_the_planets_that_orbit_it
Today’s Sydney Morning Herald – linked through google news-
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/csiro-survey-most-coalition-voters-reject-humans-to-blame-for-climate-change-20151103-gkpgf8.html
Some fantastic facts in this article. I like the reference to NOAA and NASA being trusted.
Global cooling of the 1970’s is just a myth made up by global climate disruption deniers who work for big tobacco. Real scientists of the 1970’s like Stephen Schneider….oh wait.
Schneider drunk the kool aid, saw the light and realized there was more money with a new lie
1.8 degrees cooling from 1955 to 1979… ? (I assume he meant F degrees)
Where is that shown in the Hansen/Gavin fabricated temperatures?
All gorn !! Never to be seen again (unless of course they need to invent a cooling trend)
You have no Al Gore Rhythm
Steven, you have forgotten that you and your supporters have been claiming the adjustments are wrong because they always make the past colder. Now you are claiming this adjustment is wrong because it makes the past warmer. You can’t have it both ways. Actually, both your claims were wrong, but this one really exposes a lack of integrity. And it’s not in the adjustments to the data.
It’s about data fraud…
From: Tom Wigley
To: Phil Jones
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer
It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.
They knew that this was problematic for their “cause”, and they fudged the numbers.
Steven, Schneider was concerned about the cooling effect of aerosols caused by manmade air pollution and, of course, volcanoes. There was no ice age expected. The reason the cooling ended was we reduced the air pollution. Or, actually, the EPA got us to reduce air pollution. At that time, we knew about the greenhouse effect, but we didn’t know much about how we were changing it.
This Stephen Schneider?
“We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public’s imagination…
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts…
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.”
– Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports
Yeah, I would place my trust in him! 😆
Gator no need to reply to Mindless Martin. He is a mind washed, kool-aid drinking (the purple kind), bot and cannot change.
His only hope is to be able to show his work to the “global overpopulation elite” with the hope that they will believe he was a follower and not be culled. Others have identified his type as “Useful Idiots”.
Here are the people he is defending.
http://thetruthwins.com/archives/30-population-control-quotes-that-show-that-the-elite-truly-believe-that-humans-are-a-plague-upon-the-earth
DD More
You forgot the REAL reason the elite want to ‘cull the herd’ (aside from the fact that fewer more compliant people are much more easy to manage.)
This type of attitude toward the treatment of fellow humans as nothing more than cattle (chattel) is described by Fabian Co-founder George Bernard Shaw.
Sure sounds like slavery to me with no hope of being a free person.
And don’t forget the Eugenics part that is also embraced with enthusiasm by the Webbs, the other co-founders of the Fabian Society. As well as Hitlery Clinton’s hero, planned parenthood founder Margaret Sanger (Interesting how all of these people intesect)
This all comes down to us from Ancient Sparta
You see it all depends on whether your view point is that the individual should serve the State or whether the State is there to protect the rights of the individual. It really is that simple.
If you believe the State should be served by the individual you have Sparta:
Now Gail, I did remember and have followed you links on this before. Just wanted to keep it a little short so Marty would be able to read.
A little quote for you Gail.
“I came, I saw, she conquered.”
The original Latin seems to have been garbled.”
? Robert A. Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
DD More,
Thanks for the Heinlein Quote.
As The Paris-ite Feast approaches, I am becoming increasingly short tempered with idiots like Martin. I would happily let the idiots become the slaves they seem to want to be if they would leave the rest of us out of the Hellhole they are building. But as the Soviets found out, once people find out they are slaves with nasty brutal lives they will leave as fast as they can. That is why the Elite want to make a worldwide Hellhole so no one has any chance of escape except death.
OH, and Martin here is another who points out problems with Kriging:
http://manicbeancounter.com/2015/09/17/a-note-on-bias-in-australian-temperature-homogenisations/