NEWS8 in Connecticut says there is a great deal of science behind their claim that sea level rise is caused by carbon emissions.
Report: threat of coastal flooding from Global Warming | WTNH Connecticut News
What they mean by “a great deal of science” is “a great deal of stupidity.” Sea level in the region has been rising at basically the same rate since the Civil War.
And the peak sea level rise rates actually occurred just after WWII.
Sea Level Trends – Variation of 50-year Mean Sea Level Trends
Sea level rise in Connecticut shows zero evidence of a correlation with carbon emissions, and zero evidence that it can be altered. Peak rise rates occurred when CO2 was below 320 PPM. Reducing CO2 would not slow sea level rise.
There is not one smidgen of science behind the NEWS8 claims. Just stupidity and superstition.
“There’s a great deal of science behind it, but basically…”
Translation: I don’t understand any of the details on this, and you shouldn’t worry about that either. Here are the key things we are supposed to believe.
That issue will also be discussed if this conference paper on “Geoethics: The principles of ethics in Natural Sciences,” is presented in Paris.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283641399_Geoethics_the_principles_of_ethics_in_Natural_Sciences
“There’s a great deal of science behind it, but basically…”
Trouble is, the real scientists have been marginalised if they did not go along with the political narrative.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOXeTDjx8vg
WTNH 8 of Connecticut once employed the late Dr Mel Goldstein as a meteorologist. I can say beyond a doubt he would have called this report: NONSENSE!
Add in data showing Plate reduction.
State became famous for fraudsters selling local Red Cedar to rural folks as super expensive Nutmeg only grown in Tropical climate area.
Entire DC delegation have entire careers based on green lemming vote with “friendly law suit” revune recipients donations.
Perfected by current Hillary Yale fail classmate Senator Suethemall whilst he was AG for 25 years. Current head of WPA was co -con artist supplicant.
Nutmeg sales are soaring with giant circle of circle jerks to descend on PARIS …..to redistribute same world wide.
“there is a great deal of science behind it all” kind of gives away the intellectual level of this discussion.
Welcome to my local news.
You poor thing having this as a Congress Critter:
http://satireworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Rosa-DeLauro-987-300×199.jpg
The Wicked Witch of the East
And Blumenthal too.
Gail: I don’t recognize this woman or is it a man? Could you tell me who it is?
The real question is, is it human?
And it is Rosa DeLauro. Her Husband is Stan Greenberg.
I wonder where those millions amassed “during public service” came from, don’t you???
She was pushing the Food Safety Modernization Act for over ten years. Ever since the WTO was signed in 1995.
Then there is Greenberg:
blockquote>Whether you want to win your election, lead your country, increase your bottom line, or change the world, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner can help you find the answer,” GQRR states on its website http://www.gqrr.com/
From another source:
(Links maybe stale since they are several years old.)
I didn’t know Keith Richards was a congressman.
Don’t be ridiculous, that’s a Walking Dead extra.
Steven, the database is back on line now, is it? So it wasn’t removed after all? No apology from you?
It has nothing to do with “the database.” Something convinced them to restore their old web page.
No, Steven. It’s pretty obvious they were upgrading their website. During your hissy fit in which you accused them of fraud for removing the page, if you had looked for an answer, you would have seen their warning message that the database from which that page was generated was offline. You owe NOAA an apology.
Martin the Gore bot is a low-end software engineer with ZERO understand of anything to do with climate science.
He also markets himself as a technical writer.. one can only imagine how un-technical those rants would be !!
He also thinks the cartoonist site , SkS, actually present something resembling science.. seriously !!!
He frequents a site run by a Peter Sinclair aka Greenman, who fancies himself as a low-end videographer making propaganda mis-information videos about anyone who questions the AGW meme. Peter was apparently “trained” ie brain-washed, by Al Gore.
He is base-level troll, nothing more and has yet to produce one iota of evidence countering anything SG has put forward.
As You can see there is a good correlation between CO2 and temperature rise after 1950
What happened before 1950 is another story:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1950/to/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1900/to:1950/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1950/trend/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1900/to:1950/trend/plot/esrl-co2/offset:-300/scale:0.01
No there isn’t. You are parroting propaganda.
Correlation is no explanation.
I was hinting on the period 1900-1950.
However NO correlation is a killer…. Unless you are talking CAGW.
My point is that your post-1950 claim is based on bogus temperature data
Steven, if you have any evidence that any adjustment to any dataset is incorrect, post your evidence. You have never posted any such evidence. Your claims are completely unsupported.
Steven has posted plenty of evidence. You are just too lazy to go look for it.
Gail, Steven has posted plenty of evidence that data has been adjusted, a fact that is not in dispute. He has posted no evidence that any adjustment is incorrect, and he has posted no evidence of fraud.
WRONG!
Steven has posted the evidence. You have not bothered to LOOK.
I have been on this site for years and have many such bookmarked but I will not do your legwork for you.
So just keep making a fool of yourself and we will continue to laugh.
Gail, I know he hasn’t posted any evidence that adjustments are incorrect during my presence here, and he has made the same accusation of fraud many times during that period, in each case, without any supporting evidence. And none of you minions has yet posted any such evidence from the past, although you and a few others have tried to obfuscate further by posting even more evidence that data has been adjusted.
So? Alarmists blame man for changing global climate with zero evidence. I’d say we’re even.
You have been here for about a month and done nothing but call Steven a liar. Why should he respond to you and why should we do your legwork for you?
If this was SkS you would have been banned long, long ago and all your comments removed. Here we just laugh at you instead because your attempts are so pathetic.
Now again GO DO YOUR LEGWORK.
“Gail, Steven has posted plenty of evidence that data has been adjusted, a fact that is not in dispute. He has posted no evidence that any adjustment is incorrect, and he has posted no evidence of fraud.”
When data is “adjusted” far beyond its original error bars that is clear evidence that it is incorrect. The fact that they have refused to justify and explain their adjustments is clear evidence that it is fraud, or, at the very least, no longer science.
And no, your simple repetition that “they have explained all their adjustments” is not even evidence. It is simple assertion on your part. When asked to link to their detailed explanations you have failed to do so. When asked to provide an explanation of even a single year’s adjustment (1880) you have admitted that you are unable to do so.
Martin, your writing is evidence (not proof) that you are a bright person with the capability of thought. I do not understand why you refuse to do so. I can only assume that your purpose here is something other than rational discourse.
Martin the Gore bot is a low-end software engineer with ZERO understand of anything to do with climate science.
He also markets himself as a technical writer.. one can only imagine how un-technical those rants would be !!
He also thinks the cartoonist site , SkS, actually present something resembling science.. seriously !!!
He frequents a site run by a Peter Sinclair aka Greenman, who fancies himself as a low-end videographer making propaganda mis-information videos about anyone who questions the AGW meme. Peter was apparently “trained” ie brain-washed, by Al Gore.
He is base-level troll, nothing more and has yet to produce one iota of evidence countering anything SG has put forward.
He is a waste of time and space, mostly his own… but is just too dumb to realise it.
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/troll_closet_scr.jpg
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/USHCNvsCO2.jpg
Of course the temp corrections have been explained. Try opening your…oh you are ALEC Anti-GCC Parrot assholes, so of course you cannot open your eyes. Anyway, for those that actually WANT to hear the rationale for the correction it can be found in the youtube series by Potholer54
http://www.tinyurl.com/youtubegcc
Have fun moron anti-science cretins.
(Yawn)
Please do me two favors.
1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.
2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.
There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.