Why would government funded scientists want to raise taxes to keep their grant money coming in?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Latest From Michael Mann
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Latest From Michael Mann
- Disillusioned on Latest From Michael Mann
- John Nebilak on Latest From Michael Mann
- arn on Latest From Michael Mann
- czechlist on Latest From Michael Mann
- Disillusioned on Latest From Michael Mann
- Gordon Vigurs on Latest From Michael Mann
- Jack the Insider on Latest From Michael Mann
- Conrad Ziefle on Latest From Michael Mann
- arn on Latest From Michael Mann
Whatever they are mining must have societal benefit if they are “hugely successful”. Also, it goes without saying that increasing taxes will not reduce fires, floods, cyclones, etc. which have been happeing with regularity in Australia since the beginning of time.
I’ve been reading H. H. Lamb’s Climatology, History, and the Modern World (ed 2, 1995). One of the interesting things I encountered (along with the statement that most climatologists believe the mountain glaciers were formed during the present interglacial period) is that the onset of the Little Ice Age was marked by an increase in storms, flooding and droughts. It seems that once upon a time increased volatility of weather and extreme events were associated with cooling. Not any more, I guess.