Hansen says warming has slowed. Jones says warming has slowed. But The Guardian grabs the torch and accelerates the bullshit past a level which even Hansen can stomach.
That is called fraud and journalistic malfeasance, Dana.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
Recent Comments
- toorightmate on Election Results
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on Election Results
- Robertvd on Election Results
- arn on Election Results
- Gordon Vigurs on Election Results
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on Election Results
- Disillusioned on Election Results
- conrad ziefle on Election Results
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Trenberth looked at a data set which was based on a model, of where all the missing heat went. And it all disappeared into the deep ocean. Or maybe the model/reanalysis is wishful thinking on Trenberth’s part. 😉
(I prefer science where they predict what will happen and then it happens, as opposed to the theory going wrong and then inventing a new theory post hoc to explain why their original theory isn’t actually wrong. But I’m a bit old fashioned that way.)
I’ve responded to Dana Nuccitelli’s post here:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/dana-nuccitelli-misleads-and-misinforms-in-his-first-blog-post-at-the-guardian/
99% of those surveyed were not included in the results, and we are left with the real one percenters, who would be king.