Thirty three percent of the US is more than two degrees below normal. Nine percent is more than four degrees below normal. Three percent is more than six degrees below normal.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Francis Barnett on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- dm on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Tel on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Gamecock on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Terry Shipman on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
And the US Extremes Index says Jan-March is one of the “most unextreme” on record!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/graph/1c/ytd
Well, yeah. I guess they’re still stuck in the global warming orientation. If things have cooled, they haven’t warmed. And if they haven’t warmed higher than average for that time span, the temperature change isn’t extreme. “most unextreme” is a way of saying “way, WAY lower than what we expected or what is useful for our polemics.”
By summer all this will be adjusted to the hottest on record by the ministry of truth.
Yeah. Or they will just ignore the 79% and claim the other 21% of temps were unprecedented. 🙂
As Orwell put it:
• “Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct; nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary.” George Orwell
And we’re also nearing the height of the Solar Max. I guess the glaciers will start moving this winter!
Tweet, tweet.
It looks like the ‘climate’ is changing after all. 😉
Steve, As you repeatedly point out, the “adjustments” in the historical data end up corrupting it rather than correcting it. The current graphs, stories, of extremes, records, current deviations from averages, etc. all become moot because of the “adjustments”. That is a true travesty!
Revising history leads to other “issues” like documented historical events like the Dust Bowl. You’ve done posts on it, but I don’t recall you using the ‘Climate at a Glance’ graphs found here:http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/
Check out the “annual” temperature & precipitation for Oklahoma. You’d never know there was a Dust Bowl from that “adjusted” data. It would be interesting to see the same charts with raw, unadjusted data. Perhaps you’ve done it & I missed it when I searched.
In 2084 … The Dust Bowl? Nah, never happened, just like the global cooling of the 1940-1970s never happened. All those pictures of the Dust Bowl? Nah, photoshopped.
Re: Dustbowl. Nothing to see here, people. Let’s keep moving….
It’s clearly worse than we thought.