Gavin and Tom delivered their fraud right on schedule ahead of Paris, just as I predicted they would. They claim that October had the highest temperature anomaly ever recorded for any month.
Record-crushing October keeps Earth on track for hottest year in 2015 – The Washington Post
Somehow, they managed to calculate Earth’s temperature within 0.01 degrees – even though they had no temperature data for about half of the land surface, including none in Greenland and very little in Africa or Antarctica.
This kind of mind-blowing malfeasance would get them fired and probably escorted out of the building by security at many engineering companies.
Satellites cover almost the entire planet several times a day, and they showed that October had only the 25th highest monthly anomaly, and that the first ten months of 1998 all had a higher anomaly than October 2015.
Not only do NASA and NOAA make up fake data for much of the planet, but they massively tamper with their existing data, like these stations in Siberia where they have cooled the past nearly two degrees C since 2012 – and now claim that it is two degrees C above normal.
2012 version :Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
2015 version: Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
The graph below shows the magnitude of their data tampering since 2012.
By tampering with the station baseline, they created the large anomalies. Then they double down their fraud by smearing their bogus anomalies across 1200 km of missing data. This is needed to create their required fraudulent record temperature claims ahead of Paris.
Unfortunately the data presented here is far more damming than anything Lamar Smith will squeeze out of them (NOAA) but of course no one is noticing. They might notice what Lamar will get though because of press coverage. Eventually the truth will out but it will take years LOL
If anything this false 1C claim will just make them look worse – particularly when compared with the satellites which show nothing of the sort.
Our leaders are now desperate and dangerous, like animals trapped in the web of their own deceit.
The inevitable conclusion was written in the oldest scriptures centuries ago:
TRUTH IS VICTORIOUS, NEVER UNTRUTH
Yes, the truth will come out – BUT these jerks will claim, even though they did NOTHING, that they saved the planet, and the faithful will actaully believe the nonsense – but wait until we hit that mini-ice age…I wish we had a better sense of history – I blame institutions of so-called “HIGHER” (and probably High indeed) learning – 97% liberal professors – what could go wrong?
Reblogged this on Tallbloke's Talkshop.
I was just there, but I didn’t have access to a reply button. I wanted to share a comment I had made at WUWT after reading a post by David Archibald….https://wordpress.com/read/post/feed/9650448/868124711
That has to do with a connection between the Sun’s hemispheric ssn balance, and ENSO shifts between warm/cool. This is all about “how” the Sun interacts directly with the ENSO regions of the Pacific Ocean. This has everything to do with the warming since the mid 1970s, as well as all climate shifts as seen when looking at past records. This is a key.
goldminor
I was there and had no problem. If you click in the ‘leave a reply box’ it should unfold although Word Unimpressed has been a bit cranky of late.
I notice that Tallbloke seems to have gathered up a new troll that is Goddard bashing. He is as clueless as the Martin Gorbot.
?He is as clueless as the Martin Gorbot.????
Seriously????? .. how can that be possible ?????
Check it out:
https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/record-crushing-fraud-from-noaa-and-nasa-ahead-of-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-109903
Gail, Unfortunately we can’t “check it out”, because the page in question deems to have been deleted. You’ll have to explain yourself why this individual is clueless.
Unless you approve of disparaging people on the basis of no evidence whatsoever.
NOAA’s final product…
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/map-percentile-mntp/201510.gif
Compare Europe, Africa and Greenland below and above
Look at Australia, and compare to UAH Australia for Octobers.
(Anomaly for UAH Australia in order from warmest..)
2002 —- 1.22
2013 —- 1.19
1988 —- 1.17
2014 —- 1.01
2004 —- 0.97
2008 —- 0.87
2007 —- 0.86
1998 —- 0.83
2005 —- 0.82
2012 —- 0.73
2006 —- 0.72
2015 —- 0.71
This must be getting really close to being criminal fraud from NOAA. !!
that format came out badly.. those are not negative signs, I was using “-” as a separator. Seem wordpress interpreted it strangely.
Here’s those two next to each other..
http://s19.postimg.org/bow5uxcfn/NOAA_October_fabrication.jpg
Andy,
Thanks for the side-by-side!
And for those UAH numbers for Australia. (Got a link to that?)
A lot different from how it starts out.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/map-land-sfc-mntp/201510.gif
See all that “heat” in Australia…. sorry, I don’t think so !!
In UAH for Australia, on a “year to end of October” basis, 2015 is 18th out 37 in the satellite data.
2013……0.668 ……1
1998……0.657 ……2
2005……0.632 ……3
2002……0.631 ……4
2007……0.488 ……5
2004……0.473 ……6
2009……0.448 ……7
2014……0.411 ……8
2006……0.402 ……9
2003……0.287 ……10
1991……0.266 ……11
1980……0.242 ……12
1999……0.234 ……13
2010……0.225 ……14
1988……0.194 ……15
1996……0.124 ……16
2011……0.123 ……17
2015……0.097……18
Probably getting their data from BOM !! 😉
“Probably getting their data from BOM !!”
I mean NOAA, of course.. hand in hand in cahoots with BOM.
We’re supposed to believe that this is coincidentally prior to their big “climate” CON-fab in Paris? This October’s weather was as typical as typical can be… FOH
NOAAgate is about to blow. Lamar has the goods and the whistleblowers are so fed up with the corruption that they’ve jumped ship to the other side. And now those who can, have a choice: remain and take the blame & shame – or spill the beans.
Dang, I just posted this on the other thread:
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/exxon-prosecuted-for-agreeing-with-the-83-consensus/#comment-553558
Looks Like we LOST ALREADY GUYS! They hustled the agreement through the back door and also gave it teeth that applies to ANY treaty the USA now or in the past signs!
No wonder there are 5,544 pages and the negotiations were conducted behind closed doors with no oversight by the peons who get saddled with the decisions.
…which makes the millions of Islamic “refugees” soon to be a US problem, regardless of any we receive directly, as this makes us essentially borderless. A new president and attorney general could reverse all this very shortly but for now this will require rebellion by the states and if a miracle occurs, by a cowardly congress.
The govs have their National Guard…
In theory , even if there is a 1 degree temp rise per century, every month can be the hottest ever
I really don’t know why they bother with this 10th of a degree stuff. Just up the antie and go for broke. The same people that defend them now would still defend them no matter if the suckers said it was the hottest month or year on record by 5 or 10 degrees. Why piddle around? They have already gone well past the point of plausible deniability in their fraud.
Oh, I guess I just thought of the answer to me own question. IF they did that then their reported temps would go well past their supposed tipping point and if they did that they would have to fabricate even higher temps and the scam would collapse under it’s own lies.
That has already happened
How so??? With the 1deg of warming they claim?
I think SF means to any rational person.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
With current record Antarctic ice mass and sea ice growth and record Arctic sea ice growth, inc Greenland, it’s no wonder climate criminals, Schmidt and Peterson had to make places like Australia 5 degrees *C* above normal !?
Just curious, but what’s the accuracy of the instruments/thermometers? I ask because there is no way you can get 0.01 degree accuracy for a global temperature if your instruments only have an accuracy of, say, 0.1 degree or so. At least that’s what i was taught in math class. Not that it matters, especially to the average dumbed down person on the street.
From my notes.
On Thermometer resolution, and ERROR
http://pugshoes.blogspot.se/2010/10/metrology.html
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11420
Back in 1918, the text book by Willis Isbister Milham I have linked to on occasion found the liquid-in-glass thermometers used good to 0.5F and the best thermometer, a ventilated thermometer invented by Assman at Berlin in 1887, “will determine the real air temperature correctly to a tenth of a degree.”
The MMTS sensors used have an accuracy of “generally” +/-0.5°F according to NOAA
MMTS Specs: http://www.srh.noaa.gov/srh/dad/coop/specs-1.html
This paper estimate error bands:
http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/uploads/media/E___E_algorithm_error_07-Limburg.pdf
A peer-reviewed study Sensor and Electronic Biases/Errors in Air Temperature Measurements in Common Weather Station Networks by Lin et. al. concluded:
In the peer reviewed study “Air Temperature Comparison between the MMTS and the USCRN Temperature Systems” Hubbard et. al. concluded:
Klaus Hager carried out a study comparing MMTS and Glass thermometers side by side for a period of 8.5 years and found that the MMTS gave a mean difference that was 0.93C warmer. Klaus Hager is a 44-year veteran German meteorologist and wrote a peer-reviewed paper on his findings. http://wkserv.met.fu-berlin.de/Beilagen/2013/Autom%20WSt_Hager.pdf
Now Dr. Bill Johnston a retired scientist has found the same problem with Australian MMTS temperature records and a lot more…
On the quality of Australia’s temperature data by Dr. Bill (WH) Johnston.
(Former NSW Department of Natural Resources Senior Research Scientist.)
“…Thus, the average global temperature anomaly for the last 150 years is dissolved in a wide noisy uncertainty band, which is much wider than the whole assumed variation of the 20th century…”
Uh-huh. Greatest problem facing humanity? No, not really. Just fools looking at noise and drawing conclusions. If there is a future for humanity, and I thing there is, future people are going to write volumes about this scam.
I heard about the “record” world temp. for October on the radio this morning. I knew Steve and all of you posting today would be on top of it. Thanks for trying to spread a little truth!
It is all over all the news. As usual the press stenographers are doing what journalists do these days and report uncritically report whatever NOAA and NASA say with no vetting at all. I have no idea why they just don’t get rid of these so called “science journalists” and just digitize the press releases of NASA and NOAA except for the fact that the digitized message wouldn’t provide a pretty girl with nice T&As as most “science journalists” seem to be these days.
Talk about the poor choices we have. The alternative is being fed the same BS accompanied by images of Gavin’s Ts&A.
I shouldn’t have written that. I must run now and do something more pleasant to shake it off. I will try to distract myself by emptying the mouse traps and checking effluent levels in the septic tank.
Here is one to really make you lose your lunch!
A Group of Kids Are Suing Obama Over Climate Change
I didn’t get any further, I had to make a run for it.
Let’s make those little kiddies live without all the mod-cons that are totally dependant on a good solid reliable power supply.
Make them walk to school.. no mum to drop them off in the SUV.
Take away their iPhones… see how long they last 😉
That won’t work, Andy. The climate guards would just get more appropriate analog devices …
https://coloradowellington.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/red-guards-students-with-little-red-books.jpg
… denounce their mommies, and the whole climate collective would walk to school together …
https://coloradowellington.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/red-guards-marching-with-little-red-books.jpg
Expect Gavin to win some $100k ‘prize’ not long after Paris.
Tony,
Your post is very confusing. You say you are are providing evidence of fraud by both NOAA and NASA, yet the only evidence is a map taken from the NOAA website on the day NASA/GISS released its global data. All this means is that NOAA had only posted THEIR data for half the Earth’s land surface on 17th October, two days prior to their publication. You show no evidence at all for the NASA data only having 50% coverage when it was published.
This looks like carelessness on your part. It also indicates that your followers (including, by extension the denizens of Tallbloke’s Talkshop) aren’t bothered by the possible unreliability of your claims, since they have accepted the truth of what you say without question.
What an incredibly stupid comment
I Love it.
http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/ywUG3kH1rEcmYt_Mqtdffw–/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3NfbGVnbztmaT1maWxsO2g9Mzc3O2lsPXBsYW5lO3B4b2ZmPTUwO3B5b2ZmPTA7cT03NTt3PTY3MA–/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/6948d4f052066434880f6a706700eabb.jpg