Name Date Intensity at landfall ---- ---- ---------------------
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Jehzsa on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Greg in NZ on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Trevor on “records going back to 1961”
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
lol, intensity and frequency!
With Bob’s analysis (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/23/the-recent-drop-in-the-sea-surface-temperatures-of-u-s-coastal-waters/) it will be a lot longer…
Actually, I would think the opposite! Severe weather generally requires a clash of warm and cold air masses (with lots of other ingredient too).
At least that is what we were taught at Environment Canada many years ago, when I worked for them(before CAGW came around)….but then, that is just my opinion…
the fact that the water around the USA is cold won’t allow it to sustain long, but the fact that you would have very distinct air masses north and south of the cold waters…just a thought…
Keep em coming Steve, I see the water level above the chin.
Where’s Tony Duncan with some poorly thought out comment on this?
Here I spent the day reading Climate etc and the Hurricane issue was “always on my mind” while reading that site because of past claims from GT!
{pfffffftt! spilt ma beer!}
Great angle and creative thinking. You *must* exploit this.