Scientists measure Arctic soot in bid to slow global warming, oceans’ rise
BY RENEE SCHOOF
MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS
WASHINGTON — American scientists working on an island far above the Arctic Circle have been launching unmanned aircraft and digging snow samples to measure how soot helps melt Arctic snow and ice.Satellite observations in recent decades show longer warm seasons and more melting throughout the region. One reason for this is black carbon, the basic component of soot. The black pollution absorbs light energy, increasing temperatures that speed melting.
The measurements over the past month on a Norwegian island of the Svalbard group, east of northern Greenland, could help show the most useful places to reduce soot – one part of broader efforts to slow Arctic warming and the rise in sea level that it will bring to coastal communities worldwide.
Different sources of black carbon have different chemical tracers, said Patricia Quinn, a chemist and co-leader of the team. The tracers, along with models of airflows, allow scientists to figure out where the soot came from.
“So we can say this is coming from forest fire burning in this region, or oil burning in this region, indicating that those are the sources that really need to be targeted and reduced,” Quinn said.
Black carbon stays in the atmosphere for days or weeks. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, the main heat-trapping gas, accumulates in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. Scientific studies say there’s no way around the need to reduce carbon dioxide from energy use, but black carbon reductions in the meantime would bring immediate benefits.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!

Duh! The issue of Arctic soot has been known by NASA for over 7 years now yet the emphasis is on c02. The same issue of soot also arises with glaciers.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC327163/
soot kills young children in the 3rd world but that is ok as it helps reduce overpopulation