Chicken Little comes home to roost – at the chopping block.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
Don’t you think that this is a more relevant map?
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=06&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=06&year1=2011&year2=2011&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg
And please don’t complain about the 1200 km2 smoothing because what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Which means that your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
OMG – one of my favorite topics!
Try making the same map with 250 km smoothing. GISS has no data in the high Arctic. They pull those red patches out of their asses.
You totally avoided a clear statement. Here it is again:
“…your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
No I’m going to pose that statement in the form of a question.
Why do you complain about smoothing when you are obviously using a map that uses smoothing?
Inquirying minds would like to know.
Smoothing no data is a uniquely dishonest concept.
Why are you avoiding the question of why YOU are using the map at the top of this thread which also uses smoothing?
Are you as dimwitted as you pretend to be?