Chicken Little comes home to roost – at the chopping block.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
Don’t you think that this is a more relevant map?
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=06&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=06&year1=2011&year2=2011&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg
And please don’t complain about the 1200 km2 smoothing because what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Which means that your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
OMG – one of my favorite topics!
Try making the same map with 250 km smoothing. GISS has no data in the high Arctic. They pull those red patches out of their asses.
You totally avoided a clear statement. Here it is again:
“…your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
No I’m going to pose that statement in the form of a question.
Why do you complain about smoothing when you are obviously using a map that uses smoothing?
Inquirying minds would like to know.
Smoothing no data is a uniquely dishonest concept.
Why are you avoiding the question of why YOU are using the map at the top of this thread which also uses smoothing?
Are you as dimwitted as you pretend to be?