Chicken Little comes home to roost – at the chopping block.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Don’t you think that this is a more relevant map?
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=06&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=06&year1=2011&year2=2011&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg
And please don’t complain about the 1200 km2 smoothing because what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Which means that your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
OMG – one of my favorite topics!
Try making the same map with 250 km smoothing. GISS has no data in the high Arctic. They pull those red patches out of their asses.
You totally avoided a clear statement. Here it is again:
“…your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
No I’m going to pose that statement in the form of a question.
Why do you complain about smoothing when you are obviously using a map that uses smoothing?
Inquirying minds would like to know.
Smoothing no data is a uniquely dishonest concept.
Why are you avoiding the question of why YOU are using the map at the top of this thread which also uses smoothing?
Are you as dimwitted as you pretend to be?