Chicken Little comes home to roost – at the chopping block.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- conrad ziefle on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Bob G on Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- scott allen on Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- conrad ziefle on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Francis Barnett on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Jack the Insider on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Francis Barnett on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
Don’t you think that this is a more relevant map?
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2011&month_last=06&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=06&year1=2011&year2=2011&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg
And please don’t complain about the 1200 km2 smoothing because what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Which means that your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
OMG – one of my favorite topics!
Try making the same map with 250 km smoothing. GISS has no data in the high Arctic. They pull those red patches out of their asses.
You totally avoided a clear statement. Here it is again:
“…your irrelevant map is also based on the same temperature stations and smoothed similarly.
No I’m going to pose that statement in the form of a question.
Why do you complain about smoothing when you are obviously using a map that uses smoothing?
Inquirying minds would like to know.
Smoothing no data is a uniquely dishonest concept.
Why are you avoiding the question of why YOU are using the map at the top of this thread which also uses smoothing?
Are you as dimwitted as you pretend to be?