The graph below plots the PIPS July 7 ice thickness distribution for 2008 and 2011. 2008 had more ice area, but the ice was much thinner. As a result, a lot of ice melted in August and September. That is less likely to happen in 2011 because the ice is thicker and located at higher latitudes.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- CO?²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on CO?²
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
That huge, thick chunk of ice is melting very slowly. We will probably be quite pleased with the September numbers. In six weeks or so, we should know the story.
How do those plots compare with 2010?
-Scott
2010 was similar to 2011, but 2010 had a lot of thick ice near 70N latitude in Siberia. This year the thick ice is north of 75N and is less likely to melt.